期刊文献+

经脐腹腔镜胆囊切除术的应用探究

Application of Umbilical Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨经脐腹腔镜胆囊切除术的临床应用效果。方法方便选取2016年6月—2017年6月来该院治疗胆囊结石的患者90例作为研究对象,按照数字表法随机分为对照组和研究组,对照组患者采用传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术进行治疗,研究组患者采用经脐腹腔镜胆囊切除术进行治疗,对比两组患者治疗效果。结果研究组手术时间(19.1±2.8)min明显少于对照组手术时间(44.1±3.4)min(t=17.452,P<0.05),研究组术后住院时间(8.7±0.9)d显著短于对照组术后住院时间(13.3±1.2)d(t=22.125,P<0.05),研究组术中出血量(69.2±8.4)m L明显少于对照组术中出血量(110.9±10.2)m L(t=20.391,P<0.05),此外研究组患者在术后3 d、术后1周、术后2周及术后1个月的疼痛程度明显低于对照组(t=13.342、12.851、11.306、11.662,P<0.05)。结论胆囊切除患者采用经脐腹腔镜胆囊切除术进行治疗的效果更佳,手术时间短、术中出血量少、住院时间短、切口感染例数少,且患者的疼痛程度低,值得在临床中广泛推广应用。 Objective This paper tries to explore the clinical effect of laparoscopic cholecystectomy via umbilical laparoscopy. Methods 90 patients who were treated with gallstone in the hospital from June 2016 to June 2017 were convenient selected into two groups: the control group and the study group according to the digital table method. The control group was treated with traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In the treatment group, patients in the study group were treated with umbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and the treatment effect was compared between the two groups of patients. Results The operative time of the study group was(19.1±2.8)min was significantly less than the control group(44.1±3.4)min(t=17.452, P〈0.05). The hospital stay(8.7±0.9)d in the study group was significantly shorter than the control group of(13.3 ±1.2)days(t=22.125, P〈0.05). The intraoperative blood loss(69.2 ±8.4)m L in the study group was significantly less than the control group intraoperative blood loss(110.9±10.2)m L(t= 20.391, P〈0.05), In addition, the degree of pain in the study group at 3 days after surgery, 1 week after surgery, 2 weeks after surgery, and 1 month after surgery was significantly lower than that in the control group(t=13.342, 12.851, 11.306, 11.662, P〈0.05). Conclusion Patients undergoing cholecystectomy are better treated with umbilical laparoscopic cholecystectomy, with shorter operative time, less intraoperative blood loss, shorter hospital stay, fewer incision infections, and lower degree of pain in patients, which is worthy of being widely used in clinical practice.
作者 王小东 WANG Xiao-dong(Department of General Surgery,Chinese Medicine Hospital of Haimen,Jiangsu Province,226100 China)
出处 《中外医疗》 2018年第15期80-82,共3页 China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词 经脐入路 腹腔胆囊切除术 效果 影响 Transumbilical approach Celiac cholecystectomy Effect Impact
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献98

  • 1徐丽,王玉玲.经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术手术配合要点[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(31):218-218. 被引量:2
  • 2Ming-Xin Pan,Zhi-Wei Liang,Yuan Cheng,Ze-Sheng Jiang,Xiao-Ping Xu,Kang-Hua Wang,Hai-Yan Liu,Yi Gao.Learning curve of transumbilical suture-suspension single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2013,19(29):4786-4790. 被引量:12
  • 3张敬东.皮肤小伤口的缝合原则[J].国外医学(护理学分册),2005,24(10):578-579. 被引量:2
  • 4吴志明,娄建平,代明盛,孟兴成,马国峰,孔园珍,金敏.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中静脉血流动力学变化[J].中国微创外科杂志,2007,7(4):334-335. 被引量:17
  • 5RAMAN J D, BENSALAH K, BAGRODIA A,et al. Labo- ratory and clinical development of single keyhole umbilical nephrectomy[ J ]. Urology, 2007,70(6 ): 1 039-- 1 042.
  • 6NOGUERA J, TEJADA S, TORTAJADA C, et al. Prospe- ctive, randomized clinical trial comparing the use of a sin- gle-port device with that of a flexible endoscope with no other device for transumbilical cholecystectomy: LLATZER-FSIS pilot study [J]. Surg Endosc,2013,27 ( 11 ):4 284--4 290.
  • 7CHOI Y S,PARK J N,OH Y S,et al Single-port vs. con- ventional multi-port access laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: comparison of surgical outcomes and compli- cations [J ]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2013,169 (2):366--369.
  • 8FRUTOS M D, ABRISQUETA J, LUJAN I, et al. Rando - mized prospective study to compare laparoscopic appendec- tomy versus umbilical single-incision appendectomy [J]. Ann Surg,2013,257(3):413--418.
  • 9Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, et al. One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg,I997 ,84(5) :695.
  • 10Culp BL, Cedillo VE, Arnold DT. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus traditional four-port cholecystectomy. Proc (Bayl Vniv Med Cent) ,2012,25(4) :319 -323.

共引文献69

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部