摘要
学理上对既判力主观范围扩张问题讨论不足,但法官在裁判文书中已试图运用该理论进行说理,有必要对扩张的具体情形进行探讨。既判力主观范围的扩张应平衡程序保障与纠纷一次性解决等价值。以程序保障原理作为分析工具,探究既判力主观范围扩张不同情形下的依据和对策,重点探讨诉讼系属中和诉讼系属后特定继受场合下的扩张,并类型化分析法定诉讼担当场合下的扩张问题,建议程序保障机制可以从事前和事后两个角度予以完善。
There is not much discussion on academic theory about subjective scope expansion of res judicata, but a judge use this to reason their judgement. So it ’ s necessary to discuss the specific situations of expansion. Procedure guarantee and solving disputes together should be balanced. This article explores legitimacy and countermeasure of scope of res judicata using procedure guarantee as analysis tools. The emphasis is the expansion to particular successor on the condition which is different when in judgement and postlitigation. Legal undertaking uses the method of typologically analysis. Procedure guarantee can be perfected in advance and ex post facto.
作者
黄梦琪
HUANG Mengqi(School of Law,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093,China)
出处
《湖北文理学院学报》
2018年第7期44-49,共6页
Journal of Hubei University of Arts and Science
关键词
既判力
主观范围扩张
相对性原则
程序保障
res judicata
Su均ective scope expansion
the doctrine of the relativity
procedure guarantee