恶性肿瘤患者应用癌痛护理的效果分析

Analysis of Effect of Cancer Pain Nursing on Patients with Malignant Tumor

目的分析癌痛护理应用在恶性肿瘤患者中的效果。方法方便选择2015年1月—2017年12月入该院进行治疗的恶性肿瘤患者60例作为研究对象,入组对象自愿接受该研究,临床资料完整,根据随机双盲法分为癌痛护理组与常规护理组,两组各30例患者。常规护理组患者按照常规护理模式干预,而癌痛护理组则加用癌痛护理模式进行干预。评价两组患者癌痛控制效果,调查患者治疗依从性,并用生活质量GQOL-74量表评价他们的生活质量,采取统计学分析。结果癌痛护理组患者癌痛控制率与治疗依从率均显著高于常规护理组,两组差异有统计学意义(100.00%vs 83.33%,χ2=5.048;100.00%vs 80.00%,χ2=5.808;P<0.05);癌痛护理组患者在GQOL-74量表心理功能、社会功能、躯体功能、物质生活四个方面上的评分均显著高于常规护理组[(92.01±3.41)分vs(80.28±5.67)分;(94.11±2.85)分vs(82.28±5.47)分;(95.13±2.10)分vs(85.84±3.75)分;(95.09±2.32)分vs(85.98±3.44)分](t=5.015,50624,5.001,4.907,P<0.05)。结论癌痛护理干预应用于恶性肿瘤患者中,除了可以更好地控制他们的疼痛,还可以改善生活质量,提高治疗依从性,值得推广应用。

Objective This paper tries to analyze the effect of cancer pain nursing in patients with malignant tumors. Methods 60 patients with malignant tumors who were treated in this hospital from January 2015 to December 2017 were convenient selected as the study subjects. The enrolled subjects voluntarily received the study and the clinical data were complete. The patients were divided into cancer pain care group and routine group according to a randomized double-blind method. There were 30 patients in each group. The patients in the conventional care group were intervened according to the conventional care model, while the cancer pain care group was treated with the cancer pain care model. To evaluate the effect of cancer pain control in the two groups of patients, investigate the patient＇s treatment compliance, and evaluate their quality of life with the GQOL-74 scale of quality of life, and adopt statistical analysis. Results The cancer pain control rate and treatment compliance rate were significantly higher in the cancer pain group than in the routine care group, with significant differences between the two groups（100.00% vs 83.33%, χ2=5.048; 100.00% vs 80.00%, χ2=5.808; P〈0.05）; The scores of psychological function, social function, somatic function and material life of the GQOL-74 scale in the cancer pain group were significantly higher than those in the routine care group [（92.01 ±3.41）points vs（80.28±5.67）points;（94.11±2.85）points vs（82.28±5.47）points;（95.13±2.10）points vs（85.84±3.75）points;（95.09±2.32）points vs（85.98±3.44）points]（t=5.015,50624,5.001,4.907,P〈0.05）. Conclusion The use of cancer pain intervention in patients with malignant tumors can not only better control their pain, but also improve the quality of life and improve treatment compliance. It is worthy of promotion and application.