期刊文献+

索拉非尼与阿帕替尼对人肝癌SMMC-7721细胞的抑制作用比较 被引量:3

Comparison of sorafenib versus apatinib inhibitory effects on SMMC-7721 cells
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较索拉非尼及阿帕替尼对人肝癌SMMC-7721细胞的抑制作用。方法设置药物浓度6.25μg/ml、12.5μg/ml、50μg/ml、100μg/ml、200μg/ml的索拉非尼(索拉非尼组)与阿帕替尼(阿帕替尼组)分别作用于SMMC-7721细胞。采用四甲基偶氮唑盐[3-(4,5)-dimethylthiahiazo(-z-y1)-3,5-di-phenytetrazoliumromide,MTT]比色法检测索拉非尼、阿帕替尼对SMMC-7721细胞增殖的抑制作用,细胞划痕实验比较两种药物对SMMC-7721细胞迁移的影响,酶联免疫吸附测定法(enzymelinked immunosorbent assay,ELISA)检测两种药物作用细胞后,其上清液中血管内皮生长因子(vascular endothelial growthfactor,VEGF)、肿瘤坏死因子α(tumor necrosis factorα,TNF-α)、白介素6(interleukin-6,IL-6)的浓度。结果 (1)随着给药浓度的增加,索拉非尼、阿帕替尼对细胞增殖的抑制作用增强;且同一药物浓度下,索拉非尼组生长抑制率均高于阿帕替尼组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。(2)索拉非尼组、阿帕替尼组和对照组细胞迁徙面积比率分别为(0.26±0.012)%、(0.46±0.011)%和(0.66±0.023)%,三组迁徙面积比率差异有统计学意义(F=746.020,P<0.001),进一步两两比较显示,索拉非尼组的迁徙面积小于阿帕替尼组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。(3)药物作用后细胞上清液中VEGF、TNF-α、IL-6浓度,索拉非尼组均低于阿帕替尼组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论索拉非尼、阿帕替尼都对SMMC-7721细胞的增殖、迁移、细胞因子均有抑制作用,且索拉非尼作用强于阿帕替尼。 Objective The study objective was to compare the inhibitory effects of sorafenib and apatinib on SMMC-7721 cells. Methods Concentrations of 6.25, 12.5, 50, 100 and 200 μg/ml sorafenib(sorafenib group) and apatinib(apatinib group) were respectively placed in SMMC-7721 cells. The inhibition effects of sorafenib and apatinib on SMMC-7721 cells were measured by [3-(4, 5)-dimethylthiahiazo(-z-y1)-3, 5-di-phenytetrazoliumromide,MTT] assay. A cell scarification test was applied to compare the migration effects of the two drugs on SMMC-7721 cells. Levels of vascular endothelial growth factor(VEGF), tumor necrosis factor alpha(TNF-α) and interleukin-6(IL-6) in the supernatant of the two groups were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA). Results(1) With the increase of drug concentration, the ability to suppress cell proliferation of sorafenib and apatinib were both enhanced. The inhibition rate of cell growth in sorafenib group was higher than that of the apatinib group in each drug concentration, and the differences were statistically significant(P〈0.001).(2) Migration area ratios of the sorafenib group, apatinib group and control group were(0.26±0.012)%,(0.46±0.011)% and(0.66±0.023)% respectively. There was significant difference in the ratio of the migration area among the three groups(F=746.020, P〈0.001). Further comparison showed that the migration area in sorafenib group was significantly lower than that in apatinib group, and the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.001).(3) The levels of VEGF, TNF-αand IL-6 of the sorafenib group were lower than those of apatinib group in cell supernatant after drug action, and the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05). Conclusions Both sorafenib and apatinib can inhibit proliferation and migration of SMMC-7721 cells and reduce cell factors, and the action of sorafenib is stronger than that of apatinib.
作者 王一 李锦毅 WANG Yi;LI Jinyi(Clinical Teaching and Research Section,General Hospital of Chinese People's Armed Police Force,Beijing 100039,China)
出处 《中华灾害救援医学》 2017年第12期681-684,共4页 Chinese Journal of Disaster Medicine
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(81273980)
关键词 索拉非尼 阿帕替尼 SMMC-7721 血管内皮生长因子 肿瘤坏死因子Α sorafenib apatinib SMMC-7721 vascular endothelial growth factor tumor necrosis factor α
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献47

  • 1刘淑英,王晓稼.贝伐单抗在肿瘤治疗中相关毒副反应[J].肿瘤学杂志,2009,15(12):1133-1135. 被引量:3
  • 2胡大一,刘梅林,郭艺芳.老年高血压的诊断与治疗中国专家共识(2011版)[J].中国医学前沿杂志(电子版),2012,4(2):31-39. 被引量:101
  • 3范文哲,翁慧雯,姚学华,张应强,王于.经肝动脉栓塞化疗联合^(125)I粒子治疗肝细胞癌的Meta分析[J].消化肿瘤杂志(电子版),2013,5(2):114-118. 被引量:3
  • 4Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2012[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2015, 65(2):87-108.
  • 5World Health Organization. Health statistics and information sys- tems: WHO mortality database [ EB/OL 1- 2014 [ 2015-08-10 ]. http ://who. int/healthinfo/mortality_data./en/.
  • 6中国肿瘤登记中心.2015年中国肿瘤登记年报[EB/OL].2015[2015—08-10].http://www.huaxia.com/sp/xwss/dlxw/2015/04/4355225.html.
  • 7国家卫生部.胃癌诊疗规范(2011年版)[EB/OL].2011-02-16[2015-08-10].http://www.nhfpc.gov.cn/yzygj/s3585u/201103/96ce9016858d416f83da688df45e3f2e.shtml.
  • 8Li J, Qin S, Xu J, et al. Apatinib for chemotherapy-refractory advanced metastatic gastric cancer: results from a randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm, phase II trial [ J ]. J Clin Oncol, 2013, 31(26):3219-3225.
  • 9Qin SK. Phase llI study of Apatinib in advanced gastric cancer: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial[ C ]. J Clin Oncol, 2014, 32( 15 Suppl) : a4003.
  • 10Mariette H, Joep H, Stefan S, et al. Cardiovascular and renal toxicity during angiogenesis inhibition: clinical and mechanistic aspects[J]. J Hypertens, 2009, 27(12) :2297-2309.

共引文献464

同被引文献23

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部