期刊文献+

手术室电外科烟雾防护初探 被引量:1

Preliminary study on effective protection distance of surgical smoke in the operating theatre
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨手术室环境下电外科烟雾防护措施。方法选取择期全麻下行甲状腺或乳腺手术患者150例,参照随机数字表法分成C组、S1组和S2组,各50例。C组未采用吸引器清除烟雾,S1组和S2组采用吸引器清除烟雾,其吸引负压设置分别为300、500 mm Hg。分别在手术开始使用高频电刀后5 min和10 min,实时测量离电刀头10、20、30、40 cm垂直距离的PM2.5值。另外选取外科手术医生50名,测量手术过程中外科医生鼻尖到电刀头的直线距离。结果 3组的PM2.5值均随测量距离的增加而降低(χ~2=148.824,χ~2=137.016,χ~2=145.296,P<0.01),S1组和S2组在10、20、30、40 cm处测得PM2.5值均低于C组(P<0.05),且S2组测的PM2.5的值低于S1组(P<0.05)。男性医生的直线距离为(30.51±10.30)cm,女性医生的直线距离为(29.10±9.81)cm,男女之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论在百级层流净化手术室中,利用吸引负压为500 mm Hg的吸引器动态吸引,其PM2.5的浓度在距离电刀头30 cm处危害较小,且符合外科医生执行手术操作的距离。 Objective To explore the the effective protection distance of electrosurgical smoke in the operating theatre. Methods Totally 150 patients undergoing thyroid or breast surgeries under elective general anesthesia were included and randomly divided into a non-aspirator group( group C),an aspirator attraction 300 mm Hg group( group S1),and an aspirator attraction 500 mm Hg group( group S2),with 50 cases in each group. At the same time,50 surgical surgeons were selected to measure the PM2. 5 values at 10,20,30,and 40 cm vertical distances of the electric knife head in real time,5 min and 10 min after the high-frequency knife was used.In addition,the straight-line distance from the surgeon's nose to the electric cutter head during the procedure was measured. Results With the increase of measurement distance,the PM2. 5 value was significantly reduced( χ^2= 148. 824,χ^2= 137. 016,χ^2= 145. 296,P〈0. 01). The PM2. 5 values of group S1 and group S2 were significantly lower than that of group C at 10,20,30,and 40 cm vertical distances( P〈0. 05),and the PM2. 5 value of group S2 were lower than that the S1 group at 10,20,30,and 40 cm vertical distances( P〈0. 05). The straight line distance from the surgeon's nose to the electric cutter head was not significantly different between male and female doctors(P〈0. 05). Conclusion In the class 100 laminar flowpurification operating theatre,using of power 500 mm Hg attraction and keeping surgeons from the tip of electric knife more than 30 cm,can effectively prevent the harm of electrosurgical smoke.
作者 张新梅 刘思兰 张怀永 吕骏 王丽 ZHANG Xinmei;LIU Silsan;ZHANG Huaiyong;LV Jun;WANG Li(Department of Anesthesiology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University,Suzhou,Jiangsu,215006)
出处 《中西医结合护理(中英文)》 2018年第6期29-31,共3页 Journal of Clinical Nursing in Practice
关键词 手术 外科 电外科学 烟雾 保护距离 吸引器 surgery operating theatre environment electrosurgery smog protection dis- tance& aspirator
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献99

  • 1胡旭光,郑成竹,柯重伟,印慨,李际辉.超声刀切割产生的烟雾中细胞及活性的研究[J].中华实验外科杂志,2004,21(6):690-691. 被引量:17
  • 2宋文娟,戴红霞,张石红.手术烟雾防护的研究进展[J].护士进修杂志,2004,19(9):839-842. 被引量:27
  • 3Barrett WL,Garber SM,黄文海,朱江帆(摘译).外科手术中产生的烟气:仅仅是大量的热空气吗?[J].中国微创外科杂志,2005,5(4):263-265. 被引量:17
  • 4李素英,武迎宏,吕超英,邓小虹,许钟鳞,戴自祝,钟秀玲,方晓东,王芳,周力.医院负压手术室污染控制[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2007,17(7):834-835. 被引量:13
  • 5朱丹,周力.手术室护理学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:40.
  • 6Fan J K M, Chan F S Y, Chu K M. Surgical Smoke[ J ]. A- sain J Surg, 2009, 32(4):253-257.
  • 7Hensman C, Baty D, Willis R G, et al. Chemical Composi- tion of Smoke Produced by High-Frequency Electrosurgery in a Closed Gaseous Environment. An in Vitro Study [ J ]. Surg Endosc, 1998, 12(8):1017-1019.
  • 8Ball K. Surgical Smoke: Is It Safe to Breathe?[ J ]. Todays Surg Nurse, 1996, 18(5):16-21.
  • 9Hoglan M. Potential Hazards from Electrosurgery Plume- Recommendations for Surgical Smoke Evacuation[ J ]. Can Oper Room Nurs J, 1995, 13(4):10-16.
  • 10Hazard Control. Control of Smoke from Laser/Electric Surgi- cal Procedures[S]. Niosh, 1998.

共引文献87

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部