期刊文献+

组织双元性创新模式演化路径研究——两种“次优”能力陷阱讨论 被引量:7

Research on Innovation Schema Evolution Path of Organizational Ambidextrous——Two kinds of " Subprime" Ability Traps Discussion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 优秀的创新型组织通过对开发性创新与探索性创新进行有效的双元性管理,追求创新绩效和效率最大化。很多学者讨论了"开发路径依赖"和"探索持续失败"两种双元性创新能力陷阱的存在及其诱因,但并未讨论其对立情况。在论证组织双元性创新必要性的基础上,分类并对比了7种创新型组织,讨论了与先前研究对立情境下的"探索路径依赖"与"开发持续失败"能力陷阱,并详细说明了组织双元性创新均衡模式退化的4种路径。 The excellent innovative organizations can pursue the innovation performance and efficiency maximization through the effectively ambidextrous management to the exploration innovation and exploitation innovation .Many scholars have discussed the existence and causes of two ambidextrous innovation ability traps which are called "exploration path depend-ence" and "exploitation continuous failure",but the existence of opposite situations hadn't been discussed .Based on the a-nalysis of necessity of organizational ambidextrous innovation ,this paper will classify and compare 7 kinds of innovative organization ;Discuss the existence of the " exploitation path dependence" and "exploration continuous failure" ability traps in the opposite context of the previous study ;In the final ,explain the 4 paths and mechanism of ambidextrous inno-vation equilibrium model degradation .
出处 《科技进步与对策》 CSSCI 北大核心 2016年第8期93-100,共8页 Science & Technology Progress and Policy
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71102012) 中国博士后科学基金项目(2014M550140) 天津财经大学优秀青年学者支持计划项目(YQ1203) 天津财经大学研究生创新基金重点项目(2013TCZ001)
关键词 组织创新 双元性创新 探索性创新 开发性创新 能力陷阱 次优模式 演化路径 Organizational Innovation Ambidextrous Innovation Exploration Innovation Exploitation Innovation Ability Trap Subprime Mode Evolution Path
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Zi-Lin He,Poh-Kam Wong.Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis[J]. Organization Science . 2004 (4)
  • 2Benner M J,Tushman M L.Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited. The Academy of Management Journal . 2003
  • 3Tushman M L,O’ Reilly C A.Ambidextrous organizations: managing evolutionary and revolutionary change[].California Management Review.1996
  • 4Eisenhardt KM,Martin JA.Dynamic Capabilities: What are They?[].Strategic Management Journal.2000
  • 5Levinthal Daniel A,James G March.The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal . 1993

同被引文献88

引证文献7

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部