期刊文献+

随机需求下物流服务供应链订购策略研究 被引量:6

Ordering Decision in Logistics Service Supply Chain with Stochastic Demand
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对由单个物流服务提供商和集成商组成的物流服务供应链,基于集中化模式、纳什博弈模式和Stackelberg博弈模式三种典型模式,考虑市场需求随机且受服务质量缺陷承诺水平的影响,探讨物流服务供应链的订购与质量缺陷承诺策略问题。通过分析发现:物流服务质量缺陷承诺水平随着市场需求弹性系数的增加而递减,但其受物流服务集成商观测水平的影响却因合作模式不同而变化不一致;集中化模式下的物流服务订购量随着物流服务集成商观测水平或市场需求弹性系数的增大而递减,但在其他两种合作模式下物流服务订购量随着物流服务集成商观测水平或市场需求弹性系数的增加而增加;在三种模式下,物流服务供应链的整体利润随着市场需求弹性系数的增加而递减,但其受物流服务集成商观测水平的影响却因合作模式不同而变化不一致。 This paper considers a logistics supply chain with a logistics services integrator and a functional logistics service provider, where customers demand is a stochastic exponential function of quality defect rate guarantee of functional logistics service provider. In order to explore the ordering and quality defect rate guarantee decision problem of the logistics service supply chain, the optimal ordering and quality defect rate guarantee of logistics service integrator and functional logistics service provider are presented under three typical game modes: centralized decisions, Nash game, Stackelberg game. Through analysis, it is found that the quality defects rate guarantee is decreased in market demand elasticity coefficient, but the impact of the observation level of logistics services integrator on the quality defects rate guarantee varies with different typical game modes; in the centralized mode, the ordering is decreased with the observation level of logistics services integrator or market demand elasticity coef- ficient, while the ordering is increased with the observation level of logistics services integrator or market demand elasticity coefficient in the other typical game modes; Additionally, in the three different typical game modes, the overall profit of logistics service supply chain is decreased with market demand elasticity coefficient, but has different relationship with the observation level of logistics services integrator in different typical game modes.
作者 杜妮 韩庆兰 DU Ni1,2, HAN Qing-lan1(1. School of Business, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China ; 2. College of Engineering, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, Chin)
出处 《运筹与管理》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2018年第7期10-19,共10页 Operations Research and Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71671188)
关键词 物流服务供应链 订购 质量缺陷承诺 纳什博弈 STACKELBERG博弈 logistics service supply chain ordering quality defect rate guarantee Nash game Stackelberg game
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献21

  • 1刘伟华,季建华.服务供应链:供应链研究的新趋势[C]//中国物流学会.2006-2007中国物流学术前沿报告,北京:中国物资出版社,2006:1-9.
  • 2Muller E J. The top guns of third-party logistics[J]. Distribution, 1993,92 (3) : 30- 38.
  • 3Razzaque M A, Sheng C C. Outsourcing of logistics functions: literature survey[J]. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 1998, 28(2) : 89-107.
  • 4Zhao M, Droge C, Stank T. The effect of logistics capa- bilities on firm performance: customer-focused versus information-focused capabilities [J]. Journal of Business Logistics, 2001,22 (2) : 91- 107.
  • 5Zhao M, Theodore P S. Interactions between operation- al and relational capabilities in fast food service delivery [J]. Transportation Research Part E, 2003,39(2): 161 -173.
  • 6Lynchd, Kellers, Ozment J. The effects of logistics ca- pabilities and strategy on firm performance[J]. Journal of Business logistics, 2004,21 (2) : 47 - 67.
  • 7陈业华,邱菀华.供应链系统动态价格波动的熵模型[J].系统工程理论与实践,2008,28(10):59-64. 被引量:4
  • 8崔爱平,刘伟.物流服务供应链中基于期权契约的能力协调[J].中国管理科学,2009,17(2):59-65. 被引量:60
  • 9申成霖,卿志琼,张新鑫.零售商竞争环境下分散式供应链的定价与交货期联合决策模型[J].中国管理科学,2010,18(3):38-44. 被引量:17
  • 10许传永,苟清龙,周垂日,梁樑.两层双渠道供应链的定价问题[J].系统工程理论与实践,2010,30(10):1741-1752. 被引量:73

共引文献34

同被引文献84

引证文献6

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部