期刊文献+

3.0T MR扩散加权成像对直肠癌盆腔淋巴结转移的诊断价值 被引量:8

The diagnostic value of 3. 0T MR diffusion weighted imaging for pelvic lymph node metastasis of rectal cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨3.0T MR扩散加权成像对直肠癌盆腔淋巴结转移的诊断价值。方法回顾性分析经手术病理证实的53例直肠癌患者的临床资料、术前常规MRI及扩散加权成像(DWI)资料,以病理结果为参照,将淋巴结分为转移性和非转移性两组,分别测量定量参数ADC值,采用SPSS19.0软件包进行统计学处理,诊断效能采用ROC曲线分析,确定诊断转移性淋巴结的最佳临界点,计算诊断的敏感度、特异度和准确度。以P<0.05认为差异具有统计学意义。结果 116枚淋巴结中,转移性淋巴结47枚(40.5%),非转移性淋巴结69枚(59.5%)。转移性淋巴结的ADC值为(0.81±0.10)×10^(-3)mm^2/s明显低于非转移性淋巴结ADC值(1.06±0.13)×10^(-3)mm^2/s,差异具有显著统计学意义(t=10.47,P<0.01);ROC曲线分析显示ADC值用于诊断转移性淋巴结的最佳临界点为0.95×10^(-3)mm^2/s,其敏感度为91.5%,特异度为78.3%,准确度为83.6%。结论 3.0T MR扩散加权成像ADC值对直肠癌盆腔淋巴结转移具有较高的鉴别诊断价值,可为患者手术方案的选择和预后的评估提供更多的参考。 Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of 3.0T MR diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) in pelvic lymph node metastasis of rectal cancer. Methods The clinical data and the conventional MRI and DWI data of 53 patients with postoperative pathological-proved rectal cancer were retrospectively analyzed. The lymph nodes were divided into metastatic and non-metastatic lesions according to pathological finding. ADC values of metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes were measured respectively. Statistical analysis was done by SPSS 19.0 program software. ROC curve was drawn, and the cutoff value for metastatic lymph nodes detection was determined, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were calculated. A P value 〈0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results In all 116 lymph nodes, there were 47 metastatic lymph nodes and 69 non-metastatic lymph nodes. ADC values Of metastatic and non-metastatic lymph nodes were (0.81 ±0.10) × 10^-3 mm^2/s and ( 1.06 ±0.13) ×10^-3 mm^2/s respectively, the ADC values of metastatic lymph nodes were significantly lower than that of non-metastatic lymph nodes, the difference was statistically significant ( t = 10. 47, P 〈 0.05 ). ROC curve analysis showed that the ADC value for the best critical point of diagnosis for metastatic lymph nodes was 0. 95× 10-3 mm2/s. The sensitivity was 91.5%, specificity was 78.3%, accuracy was 83.6%. Conclusion The value of 3.0T MR DWI ADC has high diagnostic value in pelvic lymph node metastasis of rectal cancer, which can provide more information for treatment and prognostic evaluation.
作者 牟东景 Mu Dongjing(Medical Imaging Department of Huanggang Central Hospital,Huanggang438000,Chin)
出处 《中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版)》 2018年第4期343-345,共3页 Chinese Journal of Operative Procedures of General Surgery(Electronic Edition)
关键词 直肠肿瘤 淋巴转移 磁共振成像 磁共振成像 弥散 Rectal Neoplasms Lymphatic Metastasis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Diffusion Weighted hnaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献66

  • 1Ming Li Jin Gu.Changing patterns of colorectal cancer in China over a period of 20 years[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2005,11(30):4685-4688. 被引量:93
  • 2张赟,梁碧玲,高立,钟镜联,叶瑞心,沈君.颈部淋巴结的MR扩散加权成像[J].临床放射学杂志,2007,26(3):244-247. 被引量:35
  • 3吕晓艳,刘怀军.磁共振弥散成像评价胶质瘤术前分级的应用价值[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2007,18(5):351-353. 被引量:3
  • 4饶圣祥,曾蒙苏,程伟中,许剑民,孙益红,纪元,陈财忠,张澍杰,李轫晨.直肠癌MR扩散加权成像的b值选取及其应用价值[J].放射学实践,2007,22(10):1013-1016. 被引量:12
  • 5Center MM, Jemal A, Smith RA, et al. Worldwide variations in colorectal cancer [ J ]. CA cancer J Clin, 2009, 59 ( 6 ) : 366 - 378.
  • 6Derwinger K, Carlsson G, Ekman T. Defining stage IU disease in colorectal cancer-aspects on treatment and evaluation of surviv- al[J]. J Surg Oncol, 2010, 102(5) :424 -427.
  • 7Huh JW, Kim Y J, Kim HR, Ratio of metastatic to resected lymph nodes as a prognostic factor in node-positive colorectal cancer[ J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2010, 17 (10) : 2640 - 2646.
  • 8Danko ME, Bennett KM, Zhai J, et al. Improved staging in node-positive breast cancer patients using lymph node ratio: re- suits in 1788 patients with long-term follow-up [ J]. J Am Coil Surg, 2010, 210(5):797-805.
  • 9Bhatti I, Peacock O, Awan AK, et al. Lymph node ratio versus number of affected lymph nodes as predictors of survival of resec- ted pancreatic adenocarcinoma [ J], World J Surg, 2010, 34 (4) :768 -775.
  • 10Murakami Y, Uemura K, Sudo T, et al. Number of metastatic lymph nodes, but not lymph node ratio, is an independent prog- nostic factor after resection of pancreatic carcinoma [ J ]. J Am Coll Surg, 2010, 211(2) :196 -204.

共引文献144

同被引文献67

引证文献8

二级引证文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部