期刊文献+

选择性痔上黏膜切除吻合术治疗混合痔的疗效分析 被引量:3

Curative Effect Analysis of TST in the Treatment of Mixed Hemorrhoids
原文传递
导出
摘要 为探讨选择性痔上黏膜切除吻合术治疗混合痔的临床疗效,选择2016年2月至2017年7月成都肛肠专科医院收治的87例混合痔患者进行研究,随机分为2组,一组行吻合器痔上黏膜环切吻合术治疗(42例,PPH组),另一组行选择性痔上黏膜切除吻合术治疗(45例,TST组)。对比2组临床疗效。结果显示,2组治愈率均为100%。2组手术时间比较差异无统计学意义,P>0.05。但是在术中出血量、术后12 h出血量、术后12 h及24 h疼痛评分、术后3个月肛门失禁发生率方面,TST组均明显优于PPH组,P<0.05。结果表明,与PPH相比,TST术中及术后出血减少,术后疼痛更轻微,肛门功能更好,优势明显。 This study was to investigate the clinical effect of TST(tissue selecting technique) in the treatment of mixed hemorrhoids, selected the 87 patients with mixed hemorrhoids who admitted in author's Chengdu Special Hospital for Coloproctolgical Diseases from Feb. 2016 to July 2017 yr. and divided randomly into PPH group(total 42 patients received PPH procedure) and TST group (totaled 45 patients re ceived TST procedure) ,then compared both group's clinical effect.As results,both group's curative rate was all 100G;in operative time there was no statistical difference between the two groups( P 〈0.05);but,in intraoperative and at 12 h after surgery bleeding volume,in the pain score at 12 and 24 h after surgery,and the incidence of anal incontinence at 3 months after surgery,TST group was all superior to PPH group( P 〈0.05).Results show that in intra- and post-operative bleeding volume,in postoperative pain and in anal function,TST group is significantly superior to PPH group.
作者 白雪 贺平 BAI Xue;HE Ping(Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine College of Southwest Medical University,Luzhou,Sichuan 646000;Chengdu Special Hospital for Coloproctological Diseases,Chengdu,Sichuan 610015)
出处 《中国肛肠病杂志》 2018年第5期22-24,共3页 Chinese Journal of Coloproctology
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献49

  • 1Longo A. Treatment of hemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device:a new procedure [ C ]. 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, Rome, 1998:777-784.
  • 2Racalbuto A, Aliotta I, Corsaro G, et al. Hemorrhoidal stapler prolapsectomy vs. Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy:a long- term randomized trial [J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2004,19:239- 244.
  • 3Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemmingway DM. Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial [J]. Lancet, 2004,355 : 779-781.
  • 4Boccasanta P, Capretti PG, Venturi M, et al. Randomised controlled trial between stapled circumferential mucosectomy and conventional circular hemorrhoidectomy in advanced hemorrhoids with external mucosal prolapse [J]. Am J Surg, 2001,182:64-68.
  • 5中华医学会外科学分会结直肠肛门外科学组,中华中医药学会肛肠病专业委员会,中国中西医结合学会结直肠肛门病专业委员会.痔临床诊治指南(2006版)[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2009.9:461-463.
  • 6丁泽民,李柏年,丁义江.中医肛肠科病证诊断疗效标准[S].南京:南京大学出版社,1994.
  • 7徐昶,左志贵,宋华羽,倪士昌,陈绍棋,李激.吻合器痔上黏膜环切术106例术后并发症分析[J].温州医学院学报,2007,37(6):580-582. 被引量:6
  • 8M. Y. Mastakov,P. G. Buettner,Y. -H. Ho.Updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing conventional excisional haemorrhoidectomy with LigaSure for haemorrhoids[J].Techniques in Coloproctology.2008(3)
  • 9Chuang-Wei Chen,Jung-Cheng Kang,Chang-Chieh Wu,Cheng-Wen Hsiao,Shu-Wen Jao.Modified Longo’s stapled hemorrhoidopexy with additional traction sutures for the treatment of residual prolapsed piles[J].International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2008(3)
  • 10Claudio Mattana M.D.,Claudio Coco M.D.,Alberto Manno M.D.,Alessandro Verbo M.D.,Gianluca Rizzo M.D.,Luigi Petito M.D.,Daniel Sermoneta M.D.Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy and Milligan Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy in the Cure of Fourth-Degree Hemorrhoids: Long-Term Evaluation and Clinical Results[J].Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2007(11)

共引文献2340

同被引文献35

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部