期刊文献+

贸易自由化、行业质量差异化程度与企业加成率 被引量:4

Trade Liberalization,Quality Differentiation of the Industry and Firms' Markups
原文传递
导出
摘要 文章将企业进口行为引入扩展的Melitz-Ottaviano模型,基于中国企业数据研究了行业质量差异化程度对贸易自由化与企业加成率关系的影响,发现:无论行业的质量差异化程度如何,最终品贸易自由化均降低了企业加成率,中间品贸易自由化提高了企业加成率;但是在质量差异化程度大的行业,贸易自由化对企业加成率的影响幅度更大。同时,该影响具有明显的异质性,依赖于企业的类型、企业的生产率水平、企业从事的贸易方式及所在行业的市场集中度。 By including the firms import behaviors in the extended Melitz-Ottaviano model and based on the data of Chinese firms, this paper discusses the impact of trade liberalization on the firms' markups by taking quality differentiation of the industry into account. The results show that no matter how the degree of the industry' s quality differentiation is, trade liberalization of the final goods significantly reduces the firms' markups but trade liberalization of the intermediate goods increases them. We further find that trade liberalization has greater impact on the markups in the industries with high quality differentiation and the impact has obvious heterogeneity which depends on the firms' type, productivity level, trade pattern and the market concentration.
作者 宗慧隽 范爱军 ZONG Hui-jun;FAN Ai-jun
出处 《国际经贸探索》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第7期4-20,共17页 International Economics and Trade Research
基金 教育部基金项目:(15YJA790040)
关键词 贸易自由化 企业加成率 行业质量差异 市场集中度 加工贸易 trade liberalization firms' markups quality differentiation of the industry market concentration processing trade
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献216

  • 1沈坤荣,耿强.外国直接投资、技术外溢与内生经济增长——中国数据的计量检验与实证分析[J].中国社会科学,2001(5):82-93. 被引量:754
  • 2张海洋.R&D两面性、外资活动与中国工业生产率增长[J].经济研究,2005,40(5):107-117. 被引量:485
  • 3李小平,朱钟棣.国际贸易、R&D溢出和生产率增长[J].经济研究,2006,41(2):31-43. 被引量:472
  • 4梁静波.企业出口贸易低价竞争的现实根源及影响[J].经济管理,2007,33(7):48-50. 被引量:6
  • 5丁梅生、柏帆:《关于出口非正常低价的分析》,《经济纵横》,2007年第8期.
  • 6Baier, Scott L. and J+ H. Bergstrand, 2009, "Estimat- ing the Effects of Free Trade Agreements on International Trade Flows Using Matching Econometrics" , Journal of International Economics, Vol. 77(1 ), pp. 63-76.
  • 7Becker, S. O. and A. Ichino, 2002, "Estimation of Av- erage Treatment Effects Based on Propensity Scores", The Stata Journal, Vol. 2, pp.358+377.
  • 8Bellone, F., P. Musso, L. Nesta and F. Warzynski, 2010, "Endogenous Markups, Firm Productivity and Internation- al Trade: Testing Some Micro-Level Implications of the Melitz-Ottaviano Model" , Aarhus School of Business, Aarhus University, Department of Economics, Working paper 08-20.
  • 9Bernard, A. B., J Eaton, J. B. Jensen, and S. Kor- tum, 2003, "Plants and Productivity in International Trade", American Economic Review, Vol.93, pp.1268-1290.
  • 10Bresnahan, T., 1989. "Empirical Studies of Industries with Market Power" , In: Schmanlensee, R., Willig, R. (Eds.) , Handbook of Industrial Organisation, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp.1011-1057.

共引文献730

同被引文献71

引证文献4

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部