摘要
毛泽东的《论持久战》自问世以来,就被视为指导中华民族反抗日本侵略、争取民族独立的纲领文件,然而近年来却出现"抄袭说"等不同声音。"抄袭说"主观上想通过贬低《论持久战》的创新价值以拔高蒋百里、陈诚之作的历史地位,然而客观上却走向历史的虚无化。为了消解历史虚无主义的双重危害,就必须对相关的文本进行一种历史唯物主义的文本现象学还原,进而在反驳"抄袭说"的同时更好地理解毛泽东《论持久战》的创新价值。
Since Mao Zedong's On the Protracted War got published,it has been regarded as a programmatic document which provided guidance for the Chinese Nation against Japanese aggression and striving for national independence. However,in recent years,there have been rumors like plagiarism cropping up. Those who assume it as plagiarism want to raise the historical status of works of Jiang Baili and Chen Cheng by belittling the innovative value of Mao Zedong's On the Protracted War. However,as a matter of fact,it will definitely fall into the double nihilism of history. In order to eliminate the double harm of historical nihilism,we must carry on a phenomenological reduction of historical materialism to the relevant text. By doing so,we can better understand the innovative value of Mao Zedong's On the Protracted War while refuting the plagiarism.
作者
魏忠明
邓兴华
WEI Zhong-ming;DENG Xing-hua(Institute of Western Marxism Studies,Hubei University of Technology,Wuhan 430068,Chin)
出处
《湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第4期6-11,共6页
Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词
《论持久战》
《国防论》
《陈诚将军持久抗战论》
文本现象学
On the Protracted War
The Theory of National Defense
The Theory of Protracted Anti-Japanese War by General Chen Cheng
text phenomenology