期刊文献+

手术切口感染风险评估量表的信效度检验 被引量:1

Reliability and validity of risk assessment scale for surgical wound infection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]检验手术切口感染风险评估量表的信度及效度。[方法]采用手术切口感染风险评估量表对2017年5月—7月湖南省某三级甲等医院的232例手术病人进行调查,测定量表信效度。[结果]量表Cronbach'sα系数为0.914,分半信度为0.823,内容效度指标为0.950。通过探索性因子分析析出4个维度,累计方差贡献率为80.913%。[结论]手术切口感染风险评估量表有良好的信效度,可用于手术病人切口感染风险的评价。 Objective:To test the reliability and validity of risk assessment scale for surgical wound infection.Methods:Investigate the 232 surgical patients from third grade A hospital from May 2017 to July with risk assessment scale for surgical wound infection.Test the reliability and validity of the scale.Results:The coefficient of Cronbach's was 0.914,the split-half reliability was 0.823 and the content validity index was 0.950.Through the exploratory factor analysis,4 dimensions were released,and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 80.913%. Conclusions:The risk assessment scale for surgical wound infection has good reliability and validity.It could be used to evaluate the risk of surgical wound infection.
作者 欧高文 谢春花 杨逸辉 廖力 Ou Gaowen;Xie Chunhua;Yang Yihui(School of Nursing,University of South China,Hunan 421001 China)
出处 《循证护理》 2018年第6期495-498,506,共5页 Chinese Evidence-Based Nursing
基金 湖南省研究生科研创新项目 编号:CX2017B561
关键词 手术并发症 切口感染 评估 量表 护理安全 信度 效度 operative complications surgical wound infection assessment scale nursing security reliability validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献71

  • 1石娜,徐卫,舒雪芹,徐莉珠,廖洪菊,陈永平.手术部位感染直接经济损失的病例对照研究[J].中华医院感染学杂志,2004,14(6):601-602. 被引量:40
  • 2徐敏,聂绍发,刘爱萍,王洪波.综合医院外科手术部位感染的监测研究[J].疾病控制杂志,2005,9(4):358-359. 被引量:27
  • 3卢文岱.SAS/PC统计分析软件实用技术[M].北京:国防工业出版社,1996..
  • 4张群,席淑华,谢少飞,薛静洁,彭洁洁.普通外科围手术期抗菌药物合理使用的干预对照研究[J].中国感染控制杂志,2007,6(4):247-249. 被引量:33
  • 5Horan TC,Gaynes RP,Martone WJ,et al. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections[J]. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol,1992,13(10):606-608.
  • 6Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, et al. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection[S]. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 1999,20(4) :247-278.
  • 7Kaya E, Yetim I, Dervisoglu A, et al. Risk factors for and effect of a one-year surveillance program on surgical site infection at a university hospital in Turkey[J]. Surg Infect,2006, 7(6):519 526.
  • 8Fiorio M, Marvaso A, Vigano F,et al. Incidence of surgical site infections in general surgery in Italy[J]. Infection,2006, 34(6) : 310-314.
  • 9Fehr J,Hatz C,Soka I,et al. Risk factors for surgical site in fection in a Tanzanian district hospitaha challenge for the tra ditional national nosocomial infections surveillance system in dex[J]. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 2006,27 (12) : 1401-1404.
  • 10Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Culver DH, et al. Incidence and nature of endemic and epidemic nosocomial infections. In: Bennett JV, Brachman PS, eds. Hospital infections (3rd ed. ) [M]. Boston: Little, Brown and Co, 1992: 577-596.

共引文献353

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部