期刊文献+

矿业投资项目可持续发展后评价

Post-evaluation of Sustainable Development of Mining Investment Projects
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对传统的矿业投资项目后评价内容进行了分析,针对现有目标持续性评价的缺陷,在矿业投资项目可持续发展理论的基础上,详细阐述了项目可持续发展能力的重要性,并重点分析了矿业投资项目可持续发展后评价的主要内容。结合多指标综合评价的特点,构建了基于AHP-模糊综合评价方法的评价模型,并进行了实证应用。结果表明,方法使实际的矿业投资项目可持续发展后评价分析更加精确,有利于改进投资及指导待投资矿业项目,进而提高矿业决策和管理水平。 The content of post-evaluation of the traditional mining investment projects is analyzed.Aiming at the continuous evaluation defect of the existing targets and on the basis of the sustainable development theory of mining investment projects,the importance of sustainable development capability of the project is elaborated in detail. The main contents of the post-development evaluation of mining investment projects are highlighted. Combining with the characteristics of Multi-index Comprehensive Evaluation,an evaluation model based on AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was constructed and empirically applied. The results show that this method makes the actual mining investment project more accurate,is conducive to improving investment and guidance to invest in mining projects,and then improve the mining decision-making and management.
作者 王焱 张璨 WANG Yah;ZHANG Can(China Nonferrous Metal Mining(Group)Co.,Ltd.,Beijing 100029)
出处 《有色金属工程》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第4期127-131,共5页 Nonferrous Metals Engineering
关键词 项目后评价 可持续发展能力 AHP-模糊综合评价模型 post-evaluation sustainable development ability AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献13

  • 1Gordon Mitchell. Problems and fundamentals of sustainable development indicators[A]. Sustainable Development[R]. 1996.531-567.
  • 2Sayler, G S, Sanseverion J, Davis K L, eds. Biotechnology in the Sustainable Environment[M]. New York, London:Plenum Press, 1997.485-518.
  • 3Romer P M.Increasing returns and long-run growth[J].Journal of Political Economy, 1994,(5):1002-1037.
  • 4David Reed. Structral Adjustment,the Environment and Sustainable Development[M].WWF-International, 1996.199-244.
  • 5DPCSD(United Nations Department for Policy Coordination and Sustainable Development) . Indicators of Sustainable Department-Framework and Methodologies[R].New York:United Nations, 1996.863-877.
  • 6UNDP.Human Development Report 1990-1996[R].New York:Oxford University,Press, 1997.194-234.
  • 7Charlotte Brunn. Growth Versus Equality in Agent-Based Macro Models[R].2001.225-269.
  • 8Hardi P, Barg S. Measuring Sustainable Development:Review of Current Practice[M].Manitoba:ⅡSD, 1997.119-156.
  • 9杨纶标 高英仪.模糊数学原理及应用[M].广州:华南理工大学出版社,2002..
  • 10王巾英 王朝纲.中国建设项目评价[M].北京:中国计划出版社,1998..

共引文献171

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部