摘要
目的了解首剂脊灰活疫苗(IPV)纳入免疫规划后儿童家长的认知及态度,为制定脊灰疫苗免疫策略调整后的实施措施提供参考。方法对2016年7—12月白云街道社区卫生服务中心预防接种门诊接种脊灰疫苗儿童的家长开展问卷调查,并对在此期间参加妈妈班的家长进行个案访谈。结果本次共调查了532人,95.86%的家长知道脊灰减毒活疫苗(糖丸),76.88%认为糖丸是不安全的疫苗,21.43%的家长知道首剂IPV纳入免疫规划政策,16.73%的家长知道2价脊灰与糖丸的区别,81.39%的家长愿意按IPV+b OPV程序接种。多数家长表示赞同首针接种IPV的免疫策略。结论首剂IPV纳入免疫规划后多数家长不了解首针接种脊灰灭活疫苗的免疫策略及其意义,担心疫苗安全问题,建议进一步加强脊灰转换策略相关知识的宣传工作。
OBJECTIVE To understand the cognition and attitudes of parents of children after the first dose of IPV was included in the immunization program,and to provide reference for the implementation of the adjustment strategy of the polio vaccine immunization strategy.METHODS A questionnaire survey was conducted on fathers/parents of children who had been vaccinated against vaccinations at a vaccination clinic at the Baiyun Sub-district Health Center in Baiyun Sub-district from July to December 2016.Case interviews were also conducted with the father/mother who participated in the mother class during this period.RESULTS A total of 532 people were investigated.95.86% of the parents knew that live attenuated poliovirus vaccine （carbohydrate pills） and 76.88% considered that the live attenuated poliovirus vaccine （sugarball） was an unsafe vaccine.21.43% of parents knew that IPVs were included in the immunization planning policy.16.73% of parents knew the difference between bivalent polio and sugar pills.81.39% of parents were willing to be vaccinated according to the IPV＋bOPV procedure.Most parents expressed their support for the first dose of the IPV immunization strategy but were concerned about the unhygienic nature of the bivalent polio vaccine.CONCLUSION After the first dose of IPV was included in the immunization program,most parents did not understand the immunization strategy and significance of the first dose of inactivated poliovirus vaccine.They were concerned about the safety of the vaccine.It was recommended that the propaganda work of the polio conversion strategy be further strengthened.
出处
《中国初级卫生保健》
2018年第7期39-40,共2页
Chinese Primary Health Care
