期刊文献+

非心肌梗死冠心病患者的心肌微循环阻力指数及相关因素分析 被引量:10

Index of Myocardial Microcirculatory Resistance in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease and the Analysis of Related Factors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:应用微循环阻力指数(IMR)评价非心肌梗死冠状动脉性心脏病(冠心病)患者的心肌微循环状态,并分析影响IMR的相关因素。方法:连续纳入101例非心肌梗死冠心病患者,在血流储备分数(FFR)排除功能性病变或行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后即刻进行IMR检测。以IMR≥25 U定义为冠状动脉微血管疾病,分析IMR异常的发生率和影响因素。结果:共在116支冠状动脉靶血管中测量了IMR,IMR为14.2(11.4,19.9)U,17例(16.8%)患者IMR≥25 U。高血压、服用钙拮抗剂(CCB)的患者IMR较高(P均<0.05);服用他汀类药物和左心室舒张末期内径(LVEDD)增大的患者IMR较低(P均<0.05)。IMR与空腹血糖、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、FFR呈正相关(r=0.203、0.203、0.207,P均<0.05),而与左心室质量指数(LVMI)呈负相关(r=-0.205,P<0.05)。多重线性回归分析提示,空腹血糖、LVEDD、他汀类药物、CCB为IMR的独立相关因素(β=1.177,P=0.003;β=-7.015,P=0.002;β=-8.568,P<0.001;β=3.250,P=0.017)。结论:近17%的非心肌梗死冠心病患者存在IMR反映的冠状动脉微血管疾病;空腹血糖、LVEDD、应用他汀类药物及CCB可能是影响IMR的独立相关因素。 Objectives: To evaluate the index of myocardial microcirculatory resistance(IMR) in patients with non-myocardial infarction(MI) coronary heart disease(CHD) and to analyze the related factors of IMR.Methods: A total of 101 patients with non-MI CHD were enrolled, the average age was(60 ± 10) years and there were 68 males. IMR of 116 coronary arteries was measured immediately after exclusion of functional abnormalities by factional flow reserve(FFR) or after percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI). Data of clinic, laboratory, echocardiography, and coronary angiography were collected and the related factors of IMR were analyzed.Results: The success rate of IMR measurement was 100%. The median value of IMR was 14.2(11.4, 19.9) U and IMR≥25 U was only presented in 17 patients. There was no significant difference in IMR(P=0.648) and the proportion(P =0.706) of patients with IMR ≥25 U between unstable angina pectoris(UAP)(75 cases) and stable CHD(26 cases) patients. IMR was significantly higher in patients with hypertension(P=0.024) than those without hypertension and higher in patients treated with calcium channel blockers(CCB)( P =0.020) than those not treated with CCB. Compared with the corresponding patients, IMR was significantly lower in patients taking statins(P =0.008,) and those with increased left ventricular end-diastolic diameter(LVEDD)( P=0.005). IMR was positively correlated with fasting plasma glucose(FPG), high density lipoprotein cholesterol(HDL-C) and FFR(r=0.203, 0.203, 0.207, respectively, all P〈0.05), meanwhile IMR was negatively correlated with left ventricular mass index(LVMI)(r=-0.205, P〈0.05). Multiple linear regression analysis showedthat FPG(β=1.177, P=0.003), LVEDD(β=-7.015, P=0.002),statins(β=-8.568, P〈0.001)and CCB(β=3.250, P=0.017) were independent determinants of IMR.Conclusions: Nearly 17% of patients with non-MI CHD suffer from coronary microvascular diseases reflected by IMR. FPG, LVEDD, statins and CCB are the independent related factors of IMR.
作者 刘兴邦 何立芸 曹轲 韩江莉 崔鸣 张永珍 徐昕晔 汪宇鹏 王方芳 牛杰 王贵松 高炜 郭丽君 LIU Xing-bang, HE Li-yun, CAO Ke, HAN Jiang-li, CUI Ming, ZHANG Yong-zhen, XU Xin-ye, WANG Yu-peng, WANG Fang-fang, NIU Jie, WANG Gui-song, GAO Wei, GUO Li-jun(Department of Cardiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beij ing (100191), China)
出处 《中国循环杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2018年第7期637-641,共5页 Chinese Circulation Journal
基金 首都卫生发展科研专项(2014-2-4093)
关键词 冠状动脉微循环 心肌微循环阻力指数 不稳定性心绞痛 冠心病 Coronary microcirculation Index of myocardial microcirculatory resistance Unstable angina pectoris coronaryheart disease
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献37

  • 1向定成,龚志华,建新,洪长江,邱建,马骏.Dose protocols of acetylcholine test in Chinese[J].Chinese Medical Journal,2004(10):1564-1566. 被引量:3
  • 2FU Xiang-hua FAN Wei-ze GU Xin-shun WEI Yong-yun JIANG Yun-fa WU Wei-li LI Shi-qiang HAO Guo-zhen WEI Qing-min XUE Ling.Effect of intracoronary administration of anisodamine on slow reflow phenomenon following primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction[J].Chinese Medical Journal,2007(14):1226-1231. 被引量:38
  • 3Beyer AM, Gutterman DD. Regulation of the human coronary microcirculation. J Mol Cell Cardiol, 2012, 52: 814-821.
  • 4Niccoli G, Burzotta F, Galiuto L, et al. Myocardial no-reflow in humans. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2009, 54: 281-292.
  • 5Fiarresga A, Selas M, Oliveira E , et al. Invasive assessment of the coronary microcirculation using the index of microcirculatory resistance: Description and validation of an animal. Rev Port Cardiol, 2014, 33: 207-212.
  • 6Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Smith L, et al. Coronary thermodilution to assess flow reserve: validation in humans. Circulation, 2002, 105: 2482-2486.
  • 7Melikian N, Vercauteren S, Fearon WF, et al. Quantitative assessment of coronary microvascular function in patients with and without epicardial atherosclerosis. EuroIntervention, 2010, 5: 939-945.
  • 8Luo C, Long M, Hu X, et al. Thermodilution-derived coronary microvascular resistance and flow reserve in patients with cardiac syndrome X. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2014, 7: 43-48.
  • 9Aarnoudse W, Fearon WF, Manoharan G, et al. Epicardial stenosis severity does not affect minimal microcirculatory resistance. Circulation, 2004, 110: 2137-2142.
  • 10Yong AS, Ho M, Shah MG, et al. Coronary microcirculatory resistance is independent of epicardial stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv, 2012, 5: 103-108.

共引文献496

同被引文献121

引证文献10

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部