摘要
美国专利侵权诉讼中,合理许可费是确定损害赔偿的重要方法。和以往的乔治亚-太平洋要素分析不同,经济学家提出纳什博弈解决方案。美国法院系统通过若干判例发展出关于合理许可费纳什博弈解决方案的有关规则,该规则具有司法适用的合理性。美国专利侵权合理许可费纳什博弈解决的规则对我国专利侵权诉讼有所启发:我国应从立法上确立专利侵权损害赔偿计算方式的适用条件,可以进行合理许可费纳什博弈解决方案的司法尝试;建立合理许可费损害赔偿专家证人制度。
Reasonable royalty is an important method in determining patent damages in America. Different from previous Georgia-Pacific Factor Analysis, Nash Bargaining Solution is proposed by economists. Rules about reasonable royalty NBS have been developed through some judicial precedents in federal courts system. NBS has its judicial rationality. American reasonable royalty NBS rules provide enlightenment to Chinese patent infringement litigations:we should establish application conditions of patent damages calculation methods in legislation. We can try to use NBS in judicial practice. We should establish reasonable royalty damages exports witness system.
作者
郑书前
Zheng Shuqian(Law School,Henan University,Kaifeng Henan 475001)
出处
《河南财经政法大学学报》
2018年第4期155-166,共12页
Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law
基金
河南省知识产权局软科学研究项目"专利陷阱的有效识别方法及应对策略研究--以完善我国专利行政执法和司法制度为视角"(项目编号20170106008)的阶段性研究成果