期刊文献+

海绵密度对沙发坐垫舒适性影响分析 被引量:33

The Influence of Sponge Density on the Comfort of Sofa Cushions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 笔者以市面上常用沙发坐垫不同密度海绵及其组合形式为研究对象,使用主观评价和客观体压分布测试相结合的方法,分析不同密度海绵及其组合形式对人体坐感舒适性的影响,并确定最佳海绵密度及其组合形式参数范围。结果表明沙发坐垫不同密度海绵及其组合形式对人体坐感舒适度有着很大影响,但舒适度与海绵密度、下陷硬度及回弹指数等均相关,是综合因素体现的结果。并不是海绵密度越大沙发坐感舒适性越好,实验测得密度为32~35 kg/m^2的海绵组合形式舒适性最佳。 In this paper, the commonly used sofa cushions with different densities and various combinations are used as research objects. Subjective evaluation and objective body pressure distribution test are combined to analyze the effects of different density sponges and their combined forms on human body comfort. The optimum sponge density and its combination of parameter ranges are determined. The results showed that the sofa cushions with different densities and various combinations have a great influence on the comfort of the human body, but the comfort is the result of comprehensive factors, which is related to the density of the sponge, the sunken hardness, and the rebound index. The sitting comfort of sofa is not the greater the density of the sponge the better, there is a optimized sponge combination with the density of 32-35 kg/m^2.
作者 徐伟 程洛林 杨国庆 方露 于娜 王继青 黄琼涛 XU Wei;CHENG Luolin;YANG Guoqing;FANG Lu;YU Na;WANG Jiqing;HUANG Qiongtao(College of Furnishings and Industrial Design,Nanjing Forestry University,Nanjing 210037,China;Zhejiang Gujia Furniture Co.,Ltd.,Hangzhou 310018,China;Guangdong Yihna Timber Industry Co.,Ltd.,Shangtou 515834,China)
出处 《家具》 2018年第4期17-21,46,共6页 Furniture
基金 顾家家居技术中心资助项目(KUKA-NLJJ-201605) 宜华生活研究院资助项目(YH-NL-201505) 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)
关键词 沙发 海绵坐垫 组合形式 密度 体压分布 舒适性 sofa sponge cushion combination form density body pressure distribution comfort
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献54

  • 1张建利,姜莹,王丽燕.多变量模糊舒适度评价仪[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2004,36(8):1098-1102. 被引量:9
  • 2刘建中,铃木近,青木弘行,久保光德.汽车乘坐舒适性主观评价模型的构筑[J].汽车技术,1994(9):11-20. 被引量:27
  • 3陈玉霞,申利明.沙发舒适度的评价方法探讨[J].西北林学院学报,2007,22(2):179-183. 被引量:29
  • 4吴旭亭.人体体压分布的测量系统与评价[D].北京:清华大学,1992.
  • 5Dennis Zackarkow. Posture: Sitting, Standing, Chair Design and Exercise[ M]. New York: American Physical Theaopy Association, 1989.
  • 6de Looze M P, de Kuijt-Evers L F M, van Die en J. Sitting comfort and discomfort and the relationships with objective measures[J]. Ergonomics, 2003, 46(10): 985-997.
  • 7Wright G. Design of office chairs: Improving the situation [ J ]. OH & S Canada, 1993, 9(1) : 54 -56.
  • 8Zhang L, Helander M G, Drury C G. Identifying factors of comfort and discomfort in sitting[ J]. Human Factors, 1996, 38 (3) :377 -389.
  • 9Vergara M, Page A. System to measure the use of the backrest in sitting-posture office tasks[ J ]. Applied Ergonomics, 2002, 33 : 1-8.
  • 10De Looze M P, De Kuijt - Evers L F M, Van Die en J. Sitting Comfort and Discomfort and the Relationships with Objective Measures [ J ]. Ergonomics, 2003, 46(10) :985 -997.

共引文献97

同被引文献290

引证文献33

二级引证文献188

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部