期刊文献+

Mechanical Experiment for 3D Printing of Titanium Bone Bionic Dental Implants

Mechanical Experiment for 3D Printing of Titanium Bone Bionic Dental Implants
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [Objectives] To explore the flexural strength of 3D printed titanium bone bionic dental implants and provide a scientific basis for the clinical application of 3D printed porous bionic bone dental implants. [Methods] The cone-beam CT( CBCT) image information of 20 premolars extracted by orthodontic requirement was collected,and a new porous bone bionic dental implant was produced using modeling software and 3D printer. The premolars were divided into two groups( A and B). The universal testing machine was used to test the flexural strength of the two groups and the difference in flexural strength between the two groups was compared through statistics. [Results]Twenty 3D printed porous titanium bone bionic implants were accurately produced; the morphology of group A and group B were extremely similar to each other; the average flexural strength of group A was 2 767. 92 N,while the average flexural strength of group B was 778. 77 N,showing that the average flexural strength of group A was significantly higher than that of group B,and the difference was statistically significant( P < 0. 05).[Conclusions]The personalized porous structure root implants produced by 3D printing technology are very similar to the target tooth morphology,and show high accuracy and small error of production. Besides,the flexural strength of 3D printed personalized porous structure root implants can fully meet the requirements of the maximum occlusal force for dental implant restoration. It is expected to provide a scientific basis for clinical application of 3 D printed porous bionic bone tooth implants. [Objectives] To explore the flexural strength of 3D printed titanium bone bionic dental implants and provide a scientific basis for the clinical application of 3D printed porous bionic bone dental implants.[Methods] The cone-beam CT (CBCT) image information of 20 premolars extracted by orthodontic requirement was collected, and a new porous bone bionic dental implant was produced using modeling software and 3D printer. The premolars were divided into two groups (A and B). The universal testing machine was used to test the flexural strength of the two groups and the difference in flexural strength between the two groups was compared through statistics.[Results] Twenty 3D printed porous titanium bone bionic implants were accurately produced; the morphology of group A and group B were extremely similar to each other; the average flexural strength of group A was 2 767.92 N, while the average flexural strength of group B was 778.77 N, showing that the average flexural strength of group A was significantly higher than that of group B, and the difference was statistically significant ( P 〈0.05).[Conclusions] The personalized porous structure root implants produced by 3D printing technology are very similar to the target tooth morphology, and show high accuracy and small error of production. Besides, the flexural strength of 3D printed personalized porous structure root implants can fully meet the requirements of the maximum occlusal force for dental implant restoration. It is expected to provide a scientific basis for clinical application of 3D printed porous bionic bone tooth implants.
出处 《Medicinal Plant》 CAS 2018年第4期91-93,96,共4页 药用植物:英文版
关键词 Dental implant 3D printing technology Porous bionic bone tooth implant Flexural strength Dental implant 3D printing technology Porous bionic bone tooth implant Flexural strength
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献41

  • 1Chappuis V, Buser R, Bragger U,et al. Long-term outcomes of dental implants with a titanium plasma-sprayed surface: A 20- year prospective case series study in partially edentulous patients [ J ]. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2013, 15 (6) :780 -790.
  • 2Simonis P, Dufour T, Tenenbaum H. Long-term implant survival and success: a I0 - 16 - year follow-up of non-submerged dental implants [ J ]. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2010, 21 (7) : 772 - 777.
  • 3Papaspyridakos P, Chert C J, Singh M, et al. Success criteria in implant dentistry: a systematic review [ J]. J Dent Res, 2012, 91 (3) :242 -248.
  • 4Gargallo - Albiol J,Satorres-Nieto M, Puyuelo-Capablo JL, et al. Endosseous dental implant fractures an analysis of 21 cases [ J]. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2008, 13(2) : E124 -E128.
  • 5Balshi TJ, Wolfinger GJ. Two-implant-supported single molar replacement: interdental space requirements and comparison to alternative options [ J ]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 1997, 17(5) :426 -435.
  • 6Mazor Z,Lorean A, Mijiritsky E, et al. Replacement of a molar with 2 narrow diameter dental implants[ J ]. Implant Dent,4'2012, 21( 1 ) :36 -38.
  • 7Freitas- Junior AC, Bonfante EA, Martins LM, et al. Effect of implant diameter on reliability and failure modes of molar crowns [J]. Int J Prosthodont, 2011, 24(6) :557 -561.
  • 8Wolfinger GJ, Balshi TJ,Wule DA,et al. A retrospective analysis of 125 single molar crowns supporled by two implants: long-term follow-up 3 to -12 years [J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2011, 26(1): 148 -153.
  • 9El- Anwar MI, EI-Zawah.ry MM. A three dimensional finite element study on dental implant design [ J]. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Bioteehnolugy, 2011, 9(1): 77 -82.
  • 10Mangano FG, De Franco M, Capfioglio A, et al. Immediate, non-submerged, root-analogue direct laser metal sintering (DLMS) implants: a 1 -year prospective study on 15 patients EJ. Lasers Med Sci, 2014, 29(4): 1321 -1328.

共引文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部