期刊文献+

基于CRF和Bi-LSTM的保险名称实体识别 被引量:5

Insurance Named Entity Recognition based on Bi-LSTM-CRF
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在保险领域智能问答应用研究中,用户提问时大量使用缩写、简写的保险名称,降低了问题语义理解的准确率。为解决这个问题,本文提出使用条件随机场(CRF)与双向长短记忆循环神经网络相结合的模型(Bi-LSTM-CRF),加入预先训练好的字嵌入向量进行训练的方法来识别保险名称。实验结果表明,CRF结合双向的LSTM的方法相较于传统机器学习的方法,在保险领域命名实体的识别中具有更好的性能,显著提高了保险名称识别的准确率和召回率。 Because the insurance name is long and there are a lot of abbreviations and ambiguities in the user's query,identifying the insurance naming information in the user question becomes a research problem in insurance intelligent question answering.In this paper,a model(Bi-LSTM-CRF) combining Conditional Random Field(CRF) with two-way long-term memory networks(BiLSTM) is proposed.Then pre-trained word embedding vectors are added to train this model.The experiment result shows that:compared with the traditional method of machine learning,Bi-LSTM-CRF has a better performance in insurance Name Entity Recognition.
作者 陈彦妤 杜明 CHEN Yanyu;DU Ming(School of Computer Science and Technology,Donghua University,Shanghai 201620,China)
出处 《智能计算机与应用》 2018年第3期111-114,共4页 Intelligent Computer and Applications
关键词 Bi-LSTM-CRF 命名识别识别 保险智能问答 Bi-LSTM-CRF Named Entity Recognition insurance intelligent question answering
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献58

  • 1Zhang D, Lee W S. Question classification using support vector machines[C]//Proceedings of the 26th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR '03). New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2003: 26-32.
  • 2Cui Hang, Kan M- Y, Chua T-S. Unsupervised learning of soft patterns for generating definitions from online news [C]//Feldman S I, Uretsky M, Najork M, et al. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW 2004), May 17-20, 2004. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2004: 90-99.
  • 3Collins-Thompson K, Callan J, Terra E, et al. The effect of document retrieval quality on factoid question answering performance[C]//Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR '04). New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2004: 574-575.
  • 4Moldovan D, Pasca M, Harabagiu S, et al. Performance issues and error analysis in an open-domain question answering system[J]. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 2003, 21(2): 133-154.
  • 5Tellex S, Katz B, Lin J, et al. Quantitative evaluation of passage retrieval algorithms for question answering[C]// Proceedings of the 26th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR '03). New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2003: 41-47.
  • 6Moldovan D I, Harabagiu S M, Pasca M, et al. The structure and performance of an open-domain question answering system[C]//Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL '00). Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2000: 563-570.
  • 7Agichtein E, Lawrence S, Gravano L. Learning to find answers to questions on the Web[J]. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology, 2004, 4(2): 129-162.
  • 8Clarke C, Cormack G, Kisman D, et al. Question answering by passage selection (multi text experiments for TREC-9) [C]//Proceedings of the 9th Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-9), 2000.
  • 9Ittycheriah A, Franz M, Zhu W-J, et al. IBM's statistical question answering system[C]//Proceedings of the 9th Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-9), 2000.
  • 10Ittycheriah A, Franz M, Roukos S. IBM's statistical question answering system-TREC-lO[C]//Proceedings of the 10th Text Retrieval Conference (TREC 2001), 2001.

共引文献85

同被引文献38

引证文献5

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部