摘要
构建了物流企业和银行、物流企业与中小企业之间不完全信息的委托代理模型,得到最优激励决策和物流企业的最优努力水平,并对采用共同委托模式的双重激励机制与委托监管模式的银行单一激励和没有激励机制的物流企业努力水平进行比较分析,研究结果表明,这种双重激励机制不仅可以减少银行的激励成本,也有助于提高物流企业的监管努力水平。
In this paper, we constructed the principal-agent model with incomplete information involving a logistics company, the bank, and a small and medium-sized enterprise, obtained the optimal incentive decision and the optimal effort level of the logistics company,and compared the effort levels of the logistics company respectively with the double incentive under the joint entrustment mode, with the single incentive from the bank under the delegated supervision mode and with no incentive, finding that the double incentive mechanism could not only reduce the incentive costs of the bank, but also help improve the regulation effort level of the logistics company.
作者
吴桐
黄远新
Wu Tong;Huang Yuanxin(School of Transportation & Logistics,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 610031;Sichuan Vocational & Technical College,Suining 629000,China)
出处
《物流技术》
2018年第6期53-59,共7页
Logistics Technology
基金
2018年中国物流学会
中国物流与采购联合会研究课题计划重点课题"城市物流绩效评价及竞争力研究"(2018CSLKT2-005)
关键词
存货质押
共同委托
委托代理
双重激励
inventory pledge
joint entrustment
principal-agent
double incentive