期刊文献+

有此江山有此楼:抗战时期中日围绕黄鹤楼的记忆之争与权力重构

This Tower in the Country:China and Japan are contention of Memory and Reconstruction of Power Around Yellow Crane Tower during the the War of Resistance Against Japan
下载PDF
导出
摘要 江南三大名楼之一黄鹤楼,因历史机缘,不仅是一座城市的地标,更成为一个不断被阐释和改写的文本.王朝兴亡和名人造访,为这个文化文本不断注脚.抗战爆发后,拥有众多典籍资源的黄鹤楼被国民政府用作构建集体记忆和激发民族主义的场所.武汉陷落后,日本为实现长期占领,又对黄鹤楼构建起来的记忆标准进行消解,然而效果却不大明显.中日之间围绕黄鹤楼展开的记忆之争,显示了权力无孔不入的特点,揭示了记忆存在一种“操纵机制”.权力通过强化、消解甚至是创造出某种记忆来强化民众的集体记忆,从而推进民众对政权合法性的认同. Yellow Crane Tower, as one of the three famous towers in south, for historical reasons, is not only a urban land-mark, but also a text that can be interpreted and rewritten. Dynastic alternation and celebrity interviews, are constantly footnotes to the text. After the war breaking out, national crisis became unprecedented magnitude seriously. With many cultural resources,Yellow Crane Tower is used by the national government as a place for collective memory and stimulate nationalism. After the fall of Wuhan, in order to long-term occupation, Japanese attempts to dispel the memory standards that Yellow Crane Tower builds up, but the effect is not obvious. Memory contention around Yellow Crane Tower Show that, power is everywhere, and memory can be manipulated. Through strengthening, digestion, even creation memory,power can Strengthen the collective memory, so as to promote public recognition of regime legitimacy.
作者 赵煌
出处 《城市史研究》 CSSCI 2017年第2期149-162,共14页 Urban History Research
基金 “武汉市2016年黄鹤英才(文化)计划”资助项目的阶段性成果
关键词 黄鹤楼 集体记忆 权力重构 Yellow Crane Tower Collective Memory Power Reconstruction
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献9

  • 1林蕙玟、傅朝卿.《战争纪念性意义之差异性研究-以金门与美国盖兹堡之役纪念物之设置意涵为探讨》,《建筑学报》,第62期,2007年12月.
  • 2A. Riegl, The Modern Cult of Monunnts : Its Character and Its Origin(1903 ) , Oppositions, 1982,Vol. 25. pp. 31 35.
  • 3刘禹.《纪念性空间的研究》,第13页,北京林业大学城市规划与设计专业硕士论文,2006.
  • 4林蕙玟、傅朝卿.《战争纪念性意义之差异性研究一一以金门与美国盖兹堡之役纪念物之设置意涵为探讨》.
  • 5[美]索尔索.《认知心理学》,第283页,黄希庭等译,北京,教育科学出版社,1990.
  • 6Hue-Tam Ho Tai, Pierre Nora and France National Memory, The American Historical Review, Vol. 106. No. 3. (Jun. , 2001), pp. 906-922.
  • 7[美]本尼迪克特·安德森.《想象的共同体——民族主义的起源与散布》,吴睿人译,上海人民出版社,2003.
  • 8Jan Assmann, Collective Memory and Collective Identity, Jan Assmann and John Czaplieka, Cultural History/Cultural Studies, New German Critique, No. 65, Spring-Summer, 1995. pp. 125- 133.
  • 9胡蕙玟、傅朝卿.《纪念场域、历史的重新书写与再现:二儿八事件纪念物设置于台湾都市空间所呈现的历史新意义》,载《建筑学报》,第66期,2008年12月.

共引文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部