摘要
在中国,部分学者认为法律渊源是法律的表现形式,部分学者则认为法律渊源是法官从中寻找案件裁判依据的规范集合体。但他们都陷入了法律就是法律渊源的逻辑困境。自然法学自古以来一直秉持应然法与实然两分的理论进路,从应然视角审视与批判人定法。而社会学法学与分析法都坚守实证主义,所使用的是一元法律观的分析框架,因此,它们均不可能清晰界分法律与法律渊源。故此,面对法律与法律渊源混沌不清的理论困境,应当借鉴自然法学二元法律观的分析框架,界定法律、法律渊源与裁判规则,厘清它们之间的关系,从而破解我国法律渊源概念的理论难题。
In China, some scholars believe that the origin of law is the manifestation of the law, some scholars believe that the source of law is the source for the judge to find the basis to judge the case. But they all fall into the logical dilemma of legal origin. The natural law has been uphold two theoretical approaches, from the perspective of the necessary examination and critique of human law. The sociological jurisprudence and analytical method adhere to the positivist jurisprudence, using the analysis framework of one legal view, therefore, they can not clearly divide the legal and legal sources. Therefore, facing the dilemma of legal theory and the legal origin of ambiguity, we should learn from the school of natural law framework two legal concepts, using legal definition, legal source and judicial rules, problem of the concept of legal source in china. clarify the relationship between them, so as to solve the
作者
陈文华
CHEN WENHUA(Guangdong Pei Zheng College, Guangzhou510830, Chin)
基金
广东省哲学社会科学"十三五"规划项目(GD17CFX06)
广东省高校特色创新(人文社科类)项目(2015WTSCX111)
2016年度广州市哲学社会科学发展"十三五"规划共建课题(2016GZGJ47)
关键词
法律
法律渊源
裁判规则
破解
law
sources of law
rules of adjudication
crack