摘要
农村集体成员撤销权客体范畴的不明晰,司法实践中集体成员撤销之诉经验不足,给农村集体成员维权与司法实践带来了混乱。文章从解释论上出发,对集体及其负责人作出的决定进行综合判断。在此基础上,明确决定作出的主体为农村集体经济组织和村民委员会,将村民会议、村民代表会议、村民小组排除在外,并且将决定的违法性主要分为内容的违法性与程序的违法性。在决定效力瑕疵分类中,将未成立决定与无效决定排除在撤销权客体范畴之外,避免混淆撤销之诉与其他诉讼的区别,进而厘清撤销权客体范畴的内涵与外延,以此重新确立撤销权的客体范畴。
The unclear category of the object of the revocation of rural collective members and the lack of experience in the collective members’ revocation action in judicial practice have brought confusions to the rights protection and judicial practice of rural collective members.Based on the interpretation theory,this paper makes a comprehensive judgment on the decisions made by the collective and its responsible persons.On this basis,the main parties that have decided to make a clear decision are the rural collective economic organizations and the villagers committees,which exclude villagers’ meetings,villagers’ representative meetings and villagers’ groups.And the illegality of the decision is mainly divided into the illegality of the content and the illegality of the procedure.In the category of decision validity flaw,the undecided decision and invalid decision are excluded from the scope of the object of the revocation right to avoid confusing the difference between the revocation action and other lawsuits,so as to clarify the connotation and extension of the object category of the revocation right and reestablish the object category of the revocation right.
作者
张健
ZHANG Jian(Jianghuai College,Anhui University,Hefei 230031,China)
出处
《合肥工业大学学报(社会科学版)》
2018年第3期41-45,共5页
Journal of Hefei University of Technology(Social Sciences)
基金
安徽高校人文社会科学研究重点项目(SK2016A0087)
关键词
决定
撤销权
效力瑕疵
农村集体成员
decision
revocation right
validity flaw
rural collective members