期刊文献+

贝叶斯因子及其在JASP中的实现 被引量:45

The Bayes factor and its implementation in JASP: A practical primer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 统计推断在科学研究中起到关键作用,然而当前科研中最常用的经典统计方法——零假设检验(Null hypothesis significance test,NHST)却因难以理解而被部分研究者误用或滥用。有研究者提出使用贝叶斯因子(Bayes factor)作为一种替代和(或)补充的统计方法。贝叶斯因子是贝叶斯统计中用来进行模型比较和假设检验的重要方法,其可以解读为对零假设H_0或者备择假设H_1的支持程度。其与NHST相比有如下优势:同时考虑H_0和H_1并可以用来支持H_0、不"严重"地倾向于反对H_0、可以监控证据强度的变化以及不受抽样计划的影响。目前,贝叶斯因子能够很便捷地通过开放的统计软件JASP实现,本文以贝叶斯t检验进行示范。贝叶斯因子的使用对心理学研究者来说具有重要的意义,但使用时需要注意先验分布选择的合理性以及保持数据分析过程的透明与公开。 Statistical inference plays a critical role in modern scientific research, however, the dominant method for statistical inference in science, null hypothesis significance testing(NHST), is often misunderstood and misused, which leads to unreproducible findings. To address this issue, researchers propose to adopt the Bayes factor as an alternative to NHST. The Bayes factor is a principled Bayesian tool for model selection and hypothesis testing, and can be interpreted as the strength for both the null hypothesis H0 and the alternative hypothesis H1 based on the current data. Compared to NHST, the Bayes factor has the following advantages: it quantifies the evidence that the data provide for both the H0 and the H1, it is not "violently biased" against H0, it allows one to monitor the evidence as the data accumulate, and it does not depend on sampling plans. Importantly, the recently developed open software JASP makes the calculation of Bayes factor accessible for most researchers in psychology, as we demonstrated for the t-test. Given these advantages, adopting the Bayes factor will improve psychological researchers’ statistical inferences. Nevertheless, to make the analysis more reproducible, researchers should keep their data analysis transparent and open.
作者 胡传鹏 孔祥祯 Eric-Jan Wagenmakers Alexander Ly 彭凯平 Chuan-Peng HU1,2,Xiang-Zhen KONG3,WAGENMAKERS Eric-Jan4,LY Alexander4,5,Kaiping PENG1(1 Department of Psychology, School of Social Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;2 Neuroimaging Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center, 55131 Mainz, Germany;3 Language and Genetics Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 6500 AH Nijmegen, The Netherlands;4 Department of Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam, 1018 VZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands5 Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica, 1090 GB Amsterdam, The Netherland)
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2018年第6期951-965,共15页 Advances in Psychological Science
关键词 贝叶斯因子 贝叶斯学派 频率学派 假设检验 JASP Bayes factor Bayesian statistics Frequentist NHST JASP
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献124

  • 1Alberts, B. (2011). Editorial expression of concern. Science, 334(6057), 760.
  • 2American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • 3Anderson, C. J., Bahnik,S., Bamett-Cowan, M., Boseo, F. A., Chandler, J., Chattier, C. R., .. Zuni, K. (2016). Response to comment on "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science". Science. 351(6277L 1037.
  • 4Asendorpf, J. B., Conner, M., De Fruyt, F., De Houwer, J., Denissen, J. J. A., Fiedler, K., .. Wicherts, J. M. (2013). Recommendations for Increasing replicability in psychology. European Journal of Personality, 27(2), 108-119.
  • 5Bakan, D. (1966). The test of significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 66(6), 423-437.
  • 6Baker, M. (2016). 1,500 scientists liR the lid on reproducibility. Nature, 553, 452-454.
  • 7Bakker, M., van Dijk, A., & Wicherts, J. M. (2012). The rules of the game called psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(6), 543-554.
  • 8Barch, D. M., & Yarkoni, T. (2013). Introduction to the special issue on reliability and replication in cognitive and affective neurosciena research. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 13(4), 687-689.
  • 9Begley, C. G., & Ellis, L. M. (2012). Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature, 483(7391), 531-533.
  • 10Bem, D. J. (2011). Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 407-425.

共引文献57

同被引文献747

引证文献45

二级引证文献288

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部