摘要
目的:对比左奥硝唑氯化钠注射液和奥硝唑氯化钠注射液治疗厌氧菌性盆腔感染的效果。方法:选取2014年7月至2017年6月收治的厌氧菌性盆腔感染患者180例进行分组研究,随机分为对照组(90例,给予奥硝唑氯化钠注射液治疗)和观察组(90例,给予左奥硝唑氯化钠注射液治疗),对比两组患者临床治疗效果和杀菌效果的差异。结果:观察组患者总有效率优于对照组(P<0.05);观察组患者真杆菌、梭状杆菌、黑色消化球菌、韦荣球菌、消化道链球菌的清除率与对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:左奥硝唑氯化钠注射液对厌氧菌性盆腔感染的临床疗效比奥硝唑氯化钠注射液优势明显,可作为首选治疗方案推广。
Objective: To compare the effect of levornidazole and sodium chloride injection and ornidazole and sodium chloride injection in the treatment of anaerobic pelvic infections. Methods: 180 cases of patients with anaerobic pelvic infections from July 2014 to June 2017 were randomly divided into control group(90 cases,ornidazole and sodium chloride injection treatment) and experimental group(90 cases,levornidazole and sodium chloride injection). The clinical curative effect and the sterilization effect were compared in the two groups. Results: The total efficiency in the experimental group was superior to that in the control group(P〈0.05); there was no statistic difference of the clearance rates of eubacterium,clostridium,peptococcus niger,veillonella and gastrointestinal streptococci in the two groups(P〉0.05). Conclusion: The clinical efficacy of levornidazole and sodium chloride injection is better than that of ornidazole and sodium chloride injection in the treatment of anaerobic pelvic infections. It can be used as the preferred treatment for the comprehensive promotion.
作者
李宇生
黄东
LI Yusheng;HUANG Dong(Pharmacy Department of the Second Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Huizhou City,Huizhou 516000,China)
出处
《包头医学院学报》
CAS
2018年第6期44-45,共2页
Journal of Baotou Medical College
关键词
厌氧菌性盆腔感染
奥硝唑氯化钠注射液
左奥硝唑氯化钠注射液
Anaerobic pelvic infections
Ornidazole and sodium chloride injection
Levornidazole and sodium chloride injection