期刊文献+

雷帕霉素药物洗脱支架治疗老年退行性冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病无保护左主干病变:前瞻性、非随机、对照临床试验方案及预试验结果 被引量:8

Rapamycin-eluting stents for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis in coronary atherosclerosis in the older adults:study protocol for a prospective,non-randomized,controlled trial and preliminary results
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景:冠脉旁路移植术常被认为是治疗冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病无保护左主干(unprotected left main coronary artery,ULMCA)病变的金标准疗法。近年来研究表明,药物洗脱支架在治疗ULMCA病变后的心血管不良事件发生率更低,甚至有研究者认为药物洗脱支架将取代冠脉旁路移植术成新的为治疗金标准,但国内外学者对此尚有一定争议。目的:试验拟观察采用雷帕霉素药物洗脱支架植入治疗老年ULMCA病变的安全性和有效性,并与冠脉旁路移植术治疗进行比较。方法:纳入十堰市太和医院(湖北医药学院附属医院)心内科和十堰市人民医院(湖北医药学院附属医院)心内科收治的老年退行性ULMCA病变患者224例,按治疗方式的不同分为2组,支架组采用雷帕霉素药物洗脱支架植入治疗,冠脉旁路移植术采用冠脉旁路移植治疗,每组112例,术后随访9,12,24,36个月。研究中有效性的主要结局指标为术后36个月病变血管再次血运重建率。研究的次要结局指标为术后9,12,24个月病变血管再次血运重建率;术后9,12,24,36个月的血栓事件发生率、病变血管再狭窄率、病死率、死亡原因及生存时间。术前,术后9,12,24,36个月的病变血管的动脉造影形态。研究的安全性指标为术后9,12,24,36个月主要不良心脑血管事件发生率。课题组从2016年1月到2017年12月收集86例患者,分成支架组48例,冠脉旁路移植38例。预试验结果显示,与冠脉旁路移植组比较,支架组术前等待时间,术后住院时间及完全血运重建率均降低(P<0.05)。术后6个月,两组病死率、心肌梗死发生率、再次血运重建率及心脑血管不良事件发生率差异无显著性意义(P>0.05)。试验经十堰市太和医院和十堰市人民医院医学伦理委员会批准(审批单位:十堰市太和医院,审批时间2017年7月;审批号:TH005X;十堰市人民医院,审批时间2017年7月,审批号:RM011X)。研究符合世界医学会制定的《赫尔辛基宣言》的要求,研究对象均签署知情同意书。试验设计时间为2018年1月,试验计划于2018年8月开始进行患者招募,2019年8月招募结束,2022年10月进行结果指标分析,2022年12月试验完成。文章结果将以科学会议报道,或在同行评议的期刊上发表传播。试验已在中国临床试验注册中心注册(注册号:Chi CTR1800016413),方案版本号1.0。讨论:试验希望观察,雷帕霉素药物洗脱支架植入治疗老年ULMCA病变中长期随访有效性及安全性方面的数据与冠脉旁路移植术在相比,明确哪种疗法的预后效果更好,以筛选出治疗ULMCA病变最佳的策略。 BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is the gold standard therapy for unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) stenosis in coronary atherosclerosis. However, the treatment of ULMCA stenosis using drug-eluting stents has recently been reported to lead to a relatively low incidence of cardiovascular events.Thus,drug-eluting stents are a potential surrogate for CABG,and could become the new gold standard treatment for ULMCA stenosis; however, this issue remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To explore the safety and efficacy of CABG versus rapamycin-eluting stents for ULMCA stenosis in older adult patients with degenerative coronary atherosclerosis. METHODS: The proposed prospective, non-randomized, controlled trial will include 224 older adult patients with degenerative coronary atherosclerosis with ULMCA stenosis being treated at the Department of Cardiology at Taihe Hospital and Renmin Hospital of Shiyan, China. Patients will be divided into two groups in accordance with each patient’s treatment choice and indications (n=112/group): the stent group will receive rapamycin-eluting stents, while the CABG group will undergo CABG.All patients will be followed up at 9, 12, 24, and 36 months postoperatively. The primary outcome measure will be the rate of repeat revascularizations in the target lesion at 36 months postoperatively.The secondary outcome measures will be the rates of repeat revascularizations in the target lesion at 9, 12, and 24 months postoperatively, the rate of restenosis, mortality, causes of death, and survival at 9, 12, 24, and 36 months postoperatively, and the angiographic appearance of the diseased vessels preoperatively and at 9, 12, 24, and 36 months postoperatively. The safety indicator will be the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 9, 12, 24, and 36 months postoperatively. Eighty-six older adult patients with degenerative coronary atherosclerosis who underwent treatment of ULMCA stenosis between January 2016 and December 2017 were included in a pilot study. Pilot study results showed that the stent group (n=48) had a significantly reduced waiting time for surgery, hospitalization time, and rate of complete revascularizations in the target lesion compared with the CABG group (n=38) (P 〈 0.05). At 6 months postoperatively, there were no significant differences between the two groups in mortality, and incidences of myocardial infarction, repeat revascularizations in the target lesion, and cardiovascular events. The trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of Taihe Hospital (approval No. TH005X) in July 2017 and by the Ethics Committee of Renmin Hospital of Shiyan (approval No. RM011X) in July 2017. All the patients will provide written informed consent with the premise of fully understanding the treatment plan. The study protocol will follow the relevant laws and regulations of the Declaration of Helsinki and relevant hospital’s ethical principles. Design of the trial was completed in January 2018. Recruitment will be initiated in August 2018 and it is expected to be completed in August 2019. Data analysis will be conducted in October 2022 and the trial will be completed in December 2022. The results of the study will be disseminated through presentations at scientific meetings and/or in peer-reviewed publications. The trial has been registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration No. ChiCTR1800016413) and the version number is 1.0 DISCUSSION: The results of this study will indicate the medium-and long-term efficacy and safety of rapamycin-eluting stents versus CABG in older adult patients with ULMCA stenosis, and then identify which of these two treatments has better prognosis, thereby screening out the optimal strategy for treating ULMCA.
作者 陈伟 方志成 郑翔 刘伯毅 赵继先 廖应英 Chen Wei;Fang Zhi-cheng;Zheng Xiang;Liu Bo-yi;Zhao Ji-xian;Liao Ying-ying(Department of Critical Care Medicine;Department of Cardiovascular Medicine;Department of Digestion,Taihe Hospital(Affiliated Hospital of Hubei University of Medicine),Shiyan 442000,Hubei Province,China)
出处 《中国组织工程研究》 CAS 北大核心 2018年第18期2890-2895,共6页 Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献44

  • 1让蔚清,胡长平,廖端芳,李元建.心脏过敏及其机制研究进展[J].中国动脉硬化杂志,2006,14(9):817-819. 被引量:3
  • 2Loulmet D, Carpentier A, d'Attellis N, et al. Endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting with the aid of robotic assisted instruments. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1999,118:4-10.
  • 3Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, et al. Influence of the internal- mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med, 1986,314 : 1-6.
  • 4Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA Guide- line for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. A report of the Ameri- can College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovas- cular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coil Cardiol, 2011,58 :e123-e210.
  • 5Murphy GJ, Angelini GD. Side effects of cardiopulmonary bypass: what is the reality? J Card Surg, 2004,19:481488.
  • 6Abu-Omar Y, Taggart DP. The present status of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2009,36:312-321.
  • 7Wijeysundera DN, Beattie WS, Djaiani G, et al. Off-pump coronary artery surgery for reducing mortality and morbidity: meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2005,46: 872-882.
  • 8Moiler CH, Penninga L, Wetterslev J, et al. Clinical outcomes in randomized trials of off- vs. on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses. Eur Heart J, 2008,29:2601-2016.
  • 9Kuss O, yon Salviati B, B0rgermann J. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score analyses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2010,140: 829-835.
  • 10] Lamy A, Devereaux PJ, Prabhakaran D, et al. Off-pump or on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting at 30 days. N Engl J Med, 2012,366 : 1489-1497.

共引文献74

同被引文献68

引证文献8

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部