期刊文献+

探讨根治性前列腺癌病理分期及pT2病理亚分期的意义

The Significance of Pathological Staging and pT2 Pathological Subgrade Staging of Radical Prostatic Carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对根治性前列腺癌患者的病例分期和p T2病理亚分期进行探讨分析,给临床治疗提供参考。方法 2013年1月—2015年1月我院对前列腺癌患者50例开展了分析研究,依照2002/2010年TNM分期系统分期,并对患者电话随访。结果经过分期,有25例p T2患者,15例p T3a期患者,10例p T3b期患者;p T2期患者有3例属于p T2a期,22例属于p T2c期。结论对根治性前列腺癌患者进行病理分期和p T2病理亚分期能够对患者的前列腺状态给予反映,临床中诊断和治疗的价值比较高,p T2病理亚分期还有待进一步完善。 Objective To investigate and analyze the pathological staging and p T2 pathological subgrade staging of radical prostatic cancer patients, and to provide reference for clinical treatment. Methods From January 2013 to January 2015, 50 cases of prostate cancer in our hospital were analyzed.According to 2002/2010 TNM staging system, the patients were followed up by telephone. Results After staging, there were 25 patients with pT2, 15 pT3 a, 10 pT3 b, 3 in pT2 a and 22 in pT2 c. Conclusion Pathological staging and pT2 pathological substage can reflect the prostate status of patients with radical prostatectomy. The value of clinical diagnosis and treatment is high.pT2 pathological substage needs further improvement.
作者 宋莉莉 SONG Lili(Department of Pathology,General Hospital of Daqing Oil Field,Daqing Heilongjiang 163000,China)
出处 《中国继续医学教育》 2018年第19期50-52,共3页 China Continuing Medical Education
关键词 根治性 前列腺癌 病理分期 pT2病理亚分期 临床意义 radical prostate cancer pathological staging pT2 pathological subgrade staging clinical significance
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献120

  • 1汪朔,谢立平,沈华锋,郑祥毅,秦杰,白宇,张晨光,陈昭典,蔡松良,张志根,任国平,王丽君,余心如.346例前列腺癌的Gleason评分分布特征及其与临床分期的关系[J].中华男科学杂志,2006,12(8):689-692. 被引量:12
  • 2曾瑄,武莎斐,许群,肖雨,刘彤华.前列腺癌8号染色体改变与Gleason评分之间的相关性[J].中华病理学杂志,2006,35(9):523-528. 被引量:5
  • 3谢立平,蒋建平,沈华锋,郑祥毅,秦杰,张晨光,白宇,陈昭典,蔡松良,张志根,任国平,王丽君,余心如.前列腺癌血清PSA、f/tPSA与Gleason评分、临床分期的相关性研究[J].中国男科学杂志,2007,21(3):14-17. 被引量:12
  • 4许克新,王晓峰,佟雪松.血清PSA与Gleason分级及临床分期的相关性研究[J].中国男科学杂志,2007,21(5):31-34. 被引量:7
  • 5Eskew LA, Bare RL, McCullough DL. Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 1997; 157(1): 199-202.
  • 6Egevad L, Granfors T, Karlberg L, et al. Prognostic value of the Gleason score in prostate cancer. BJU Int 2002; 89(6): 538-542.
  • 7Noguchi M, Stamey TA, McNeal JE, et al. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer. J Urol 2001; 166(1): 104-109.
  • 8Steinberg DM, Sauvageot J, Piantadosi S. Correlation of prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason grade in academic and community settings. Am J Surg Pathol 1997; 21(5): 566-576.
  • 9Epstein JI, Potter SR. The pathological interpretation and significance of prostate needle biopsy findings implications and current controversies. J Urol 2001; 166(2): 402-410.
  • 10Bulbul MA, EI-Hout Y, Haddad M, et al. Pathological correlation between needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen in patients with localized prostate cancer. Can Urol Assoc J 2007; 1(3):264-266.

共引文献101

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部