摘要
新时代乡村振兴的历史使命,需要人民法庭参与其中。以北京市Z人民法庭为样本,分析发现该法庭在化解矛盾和发展社会等方面发挥有效作用的同时,也遭遇了案件审判与乡村治理相对失衡、乡村利益张力下无力应对等困惑。为此,应确定人民法庭在乡村治理体系中的司法纽带地位,明确其能够为治安防控体系建设提供司法引领、为社会关系调处提供司法队伍、为乡村重大决策提供司法信息。在人民法庭参与乡村治理过程中,只有符合司法逻辑的模式才是可行之道,即兼顾诉讼观念与有限参与的司法理念、注重法律规范与乡规民约相融合的司法技术、统筹外部合作治理与内部合理调适的司法路径,以实现"案件审判"与"乡村振兴"进一步融合。
The historical mission of rural revitalization in the new era requires the participation of the people's court.Taking People's Court Z in Beijing as a sample,it is found that the court has played an effective role in resolving contradictions and developing the society.It also encountered the relative imbalance between the case trial and the rural governance,and the inability to be equal to the rural interests.To this end,we should determine the judicial bond status of the people's court in the rural governance system,and make it clear that it can provide judicial guidance for the construction of public security prevention and control system,provide judicial team for the adjustment of social relations,and provide judicial information for the country's major decisionmaking.In the process of the participation of the people's court in rural governance,only the mode of judicial logic is a feasible way,that is,taking into account the judicial ideas of litigation concept and limited participation,judicial technology that focuses on the integration of legal norms and township rules and regulations,and the judicial path to co-ordinate external cooperative governance and internal reasonable adjustment,so as to realize the further integration of"case trial"and"rural revitalization".
作者
李凌云
LI Ling-yun(Kenneth Wang School of Law,Soochow University,Suzhou 215000,Jiangsu,China)
出处
《福建行政学院学报》
2018年第3期71-78,共8页
Journal of Fujian Administration Institute
关键词
人民法庭
乡村治理
乡村振兴
the people's court
rural governance
rural revitalization