期刊文献+

血小板/淋巴细胞比值和中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值对药物洗脱支架内再狭窄的预测价值 被引量:6

Predictive values of the platelet to lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio for drug eluting stent restenosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨冠心病患者药物洗脱支架(DES)植入术前和再次冠脉造影(CAG)复查前的血小板/淋巴细胞比值(PLR)和中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值(NLR)对于支架内再狭窄(ISR)的预测价值。方法选择于我院行DES植入术后再次入院造影复查的冠心病患者(123例)作为支架植入(SI)组,以同期行造影检查未见明显冠脉狭窄的非冠心病患者(NC,45例)作为对照组,测定造影检查或支架植入前外周血PLR、NLR及其他血液学指标;SI组按造影复查结果分为再狭窄(ISR)组和非再狭窄(NO-ISR)组两个亚组,并于造影前再次检测血液学指标。分别比较各组间的PLR和NLR的差异,并绘制PLR和NLR预测ISR的受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)。结果与NO-ISR组(89例)相比,ISR组(34例)在植入DES前和CAG复查前的PLR和NLR水平均显著升高(P<0.05)。植入DES前,PLR预测ISR的最佳截断值为107.20,灵敏度为64.7%,特异度为65.2%;NLR预测ISR的最佳截断值为2.72,灵敏度为61.8%,特异度为70.8%。CAG复查前,PLR预测ISR的最佳截断值160.08,灵敏度为26.5%,特异度为97.8%;NLR预测ISR的最佳截断值2.08,灵敏度为73.5%,特异度为56.2%。结论植入DES前和CAG复查前外周血PLR和NLR对ISR均具有一定的预测价值。 Objective To investigate the predictive values of platelet to lymphocyte ratio(PLR)and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio(NLR)before percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI)and a reexamination of coronary angiography(CAG)on the development of in-stent restenosis(ISR)in patients implanted with coronary drug eluting stent(DES).Methods For this study we enrolled 123 patients who had undergone successful drug eluting stent implantation(SI)and a further CAG reexamination.Another 45 patients with non-coronary heart disease(NC)served as controls.PLR and NLR were measured before DES implantation or CAG and compared between the groups.Patients in SI group were further divided into two subgroups based on the results of CAG reexamination:ISR group and no-ISR group.Hematologic data were reexamined before further CAG and compared between the subgroups.Receiver operator characteristic curve(ROC)was drawn to evaluate the predictive values of PLR and NLR for ISR.Results PLR and NLR before PCI or a further CAG were significantly higher in ISR group(34 patients)than in non-ISR group(89 patients,P〈0.05).Before PCI,the best cutoff value of PLR in screening restenosis was 107.20;the sensitivity and the specificity were 64.7% and 65.2%.The best cutoff value of NLR in screening restenosis was 2.72;the sensitivity and the specificity were 61.8% and 70.8%.Before CAG reexamination,the best cutoff value of PLR in screening restenosis was 160.08;the sensitivity and the specificity were 26.5% and 97.8%.The best cutoff value of NLR in screening restenosis was 2.08;the sensitivity and the specificity were 73.5% and 56.2%.Conclusion Both PLR and NLR before PCI or CAG reexamination can be predictors of ISR in patients implanted with DES.
作者 郑阳 刘晓唤 马维冬 贾珊 范雅洁 姚智会 张春艳 张岩 胡艳超 葛淼 王聪霞 ZHENG Yang;LIU Xiao-huan;MA Wei-dong;JIA Shan;FAN Ya-jie;YAO Zhi-hui;ZHANG Chun-yan;ZHANG Yan;HU Yan-chao;GE Miao;WANG Cong-xia(Department of Cardiology,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi an Jiaotong University,Xi an 710004;Institute of Health Geography,College of Tourism and Environment of Shaanxi Normal University,Xi an 710119,China)
出处 《西安交通大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第4期466-470,共5页 Journal of Xi’an Jiaotong University(Medical Sciences)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.81273878)~~
关键词 冠心病 支架内再狭窄 血小板/淋巴细胞比值 中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值 预测价值 PLR and NLR before PCI or a further CAG were significantly higher in ISR group
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献103

  • 1吴德光,李清贤,王彦富,石胜伟,李莎.胰岛素抵抗指数及高敏C-反应蛋白对急性冠脉综合征冠脉病变的预测价值[J].西安交通大学学报(医学版),2012,33(3):329-331. 被引量:12
  • 2田美蓉,李莉,赵碧琼,耿学斌,刘小坤,闫华.切割球囊在小血管病变介入治疗中的应用[J].山东医药,2007,47(4):32-32. 被引量:2
  • 3侯青,乔树宾,高润霖,等.冠状动脉支架术后再狭窄的预测因素[J].中华心血管病杂志,2005,33(增刊):61-64.
  • 4胡健,沈卫峰,张建盛,等.冠状动脉内支架置入术后再狭窄与尿酸的关系[J].中华心血管病杂志,2002,30(增刊):270.
  • 5Pepe MS.The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction[]..2003
  • 6Jeseneck JL,Noite LW,Baker JA,et al.Optimized approach to decision fusion of heterogeneous data for breast cancer diagnosis[].Medical Physics.2006
  • 7Rockette HE,King JL,Medina JL,et al.Imaging systems evaluation:Effect of subtle cases on the design and analysis of receiver operatingcharacteristic studies[].American Journal of Roentgenology.1995
  • 8Faraggi D,Reiser B,Schisterman EF.ROC curve for biomarkers based on pooled assessments[].Statistics in Medicine.2003
  • 9Franco EL,Rohan TE.Cancer precursors:epidemiology,detection,and prevalence[]..2002
  • 10Zhou X,Obuchowski NA,Mcclish DK.Statistical methods indiagnostic medicine[]..2002

共引文献68

同被引文献59

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部