期刊文献+

以评促学:“促学评价”理论及其在中国外语教育中的实践 被引量:21

A Theoretical Review of Assessment for Learning and its Practice in Foreign Language Education in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 促学评价在中国,尤其是中国大陆仍是一个新的概念。在过去的二十年中,教育评估领域正经历着从对学习进行的评价(Assessment of Learning)到为促进学习的评价(Assessment for Learning,即促学评价)的变革。本文介绍了促学评价的起源与定义,梳理了促学评价与形成性评价的理论差别,探讨了如何通过评价来促进学习的问题,重点介绍了香港英文科中学校本评核以及清华大学基于大学英语写作课堂的促学评价实践,为中国的外语教育评估改革提供了新路径,并为促学评价提供了理论支撑。 Assessment for learning in China, especially in China's Mainland, still remains a new concept. The last twenty years has witnessed a shift from assessment of learning to assessment for learning in educational assessment field. This paper clarifies the origin and definition of the assessment for learning concept, distinguishes the difference between assessment for learning and formative assessment, and discusses when and in what conditions assessment can promote learning. Two projects which attempted to apply assessment for learning to foreign language education in China were introduced, i. e., a classroom-based assessment for learning practice of English writing at Tsinghua University and the large-scale assessment in Hong Kong, English subject school-based assessment. The paper could inform the current foreign language assessment reform in China with an alternative approach, and provide the assessment for learning endeavor with theoretical support.
作者 高满满 黄静 张文霞 GAO Manman;HUANG Jing;ZHANG Wenxia(School of Foreign Languages,Anhui University,Hefei 230601,China;School of Foreign Languages,China West Normal University,Nanchong 637002,China;Department of Foreign Languages and Literatures of School of Humanities,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China)
出处 《山东外语教学》 2018年第3期33-41,共9页 Shandong Foreign Language Teaching
基金 安徽省社科规划项目(项目编号:Y06060849) 安徽大学校级重点教研项目(项目编号:J10118458041) 西华师范大学英才科研资金资助阶段性成果
关键词 促学评价 香港校本评核 基于课堂的促学评价 assessment for learning school-based assessment in Hong Kong classroom-based assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献48

  • 1曹荣平,张文霞,周燕.形成性评估在中国大学非英语专业英语写作教学中的运用[J].外语教学,2004,25(5):82-87. 被引量:184
  • 2丁邦平.学习性评价与课堂教学改革——以《科学》课评价为例[J].中国教育学刊,2005(11):40-43. 被引量:23
  • 3[1]Black P,Harrison C,Lee C,et al.Working inside the black box:assessment for learning in the classroom.[DB/OL].http://www.Kcl.ac.Uk/depsta/education/papers/Formation Asst.pdf,2004-06-02
  • 4[3]潘菽.教育心理学.北京:人民教育出版社,1983.
  • 5Black,P.; Harrison,C.; Lee,C.; Marshall,B.& William,D.(2002).Working inside the Black Box:Assessment for Learning in the Classroom.London,UK:King's College London School of Education.转引自 Paul Black:The Nature and Value of Formative Assessment for Learning,p.2.参见:http://www.kcl.ac.uk/depsta/education/papers/FormativeAsst.pdf,2004-6-2.
  • 6.[EB/OL].http://cms.curriculum.edu.au/assessment/whatis.asp,2005-02-24.
  • 7Black,P.andWilliam,D.(1998).Inside the Black Box:Raising Standard throughClassroom Assessment.参见:http://www.kcl.acuk/depsta/education/publications/blackboxhtml,12-6-2002.
  • 8Black,P.; Harrison,C.; Lee,C.; Marshall,B.& William,D.(2003).Assessment for Learning:Putting it into Practice.Maidenhead:Open University Press,p.27.
  • 9Harlen,W.(2000).Teaching,Learning & Assessing Science 5-12 (3rd ed.).London:Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd.p.124.
  • 10Rowe,M.A.(1974).Wait Time and Rewards as Instructional Variables,their Influence on Language,Logic and Fate Control,Journal of Research in Science Teaching,11:81-94.

共引文献99

同被引文献139

引证文献21

二级引证文献87

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部