期刊文献+

子宫内膜癌筛查的临床方法比较

Comparative analysis of clinical methods for endometrial carcinoma screening
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨Pipelle内膜取样器和Tao Brush内膜采样器在子宫内膜癌(EC)筛查中的诊断价值比较。方法随机选取2015年7月至2017年7月间在深圳市第二人民医院妇科收治拟行诊刮术的200例患者,分入Tao刷组和Pipelle吸管组各100例,分别用Tao Brush内膜采样器和Pipelle内膜取样器进行子宫内膜取样,然后行诊刮术,均行液基细胞学分析和组织病理学分析,比较两种内膜取样器的病理诊断符合率,以两组取材满意度、疼痛评分(VAS)、出血量、患者的依从性作为评价指标。结果 Pipelle内膜取样器和Tao Brush内膜采样器在出血量和疼痛程度、并发症、依从性上无统计学差异(P>0.05);Tao Brush内膜采样器和Pipelle内膜取样器与病理诊断的符合率均为98%,敏感度分别为95.0%和93.1%,特异度分别为96.0%和93.9%,阳性预测值96.0%和93.0%,阴性预测值95.0%和93.0%;在控制相关因素下,Tao Brush内膜采样器和Pipelle内膜取样器相比刮诊的符合率无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论两种方法均可用于子宫内膜癌的筛查,但Tao Brush价格和诊断价值优于Pipelle吸管,可为作为首选。 Objectives To compare the diagnostic value of Pipelle endometrial sampler and Taobrush endometrial sampler in endometrial cancer screening. Method 200 patients with abnormaluterine bleeding had endometrial sampling with randomly either Pipelle,or Tao brush sampler,werecompared with DC as gold standard,in the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit,the SecondHospital of Shen Zhen,China,during the period of July 2015-July,2017. Pain score(VAS),bleedingvolume,adequacy of samples and patient. s compliance were also compared between the two groups.Results There was no significantly difference in the diagnostic accuracy between two groups(P〉0.05),with a correlations of both 98% compared with DC; and the patients. factors in bleeding volume,VAS,sample adequacy and complications were matched with no statistic significance(P〉0.05).Respectively,the sensitivity and specificity of two groups was 95.0%,93.1%,96.0% and 93.9%respectively;and the positive predictive value and the negative predictive value was 96.0%,93.0%,95.0% and 93.0%,respectively in each group. It.s indicated that there is no significant difference inaccuracy between Tao brush and Pipelle biopsy compared with DG as gold standard in diagnosing(P〉0.05). Conclusion It is concluded that both Tao brush and Pipelle biopsy are useful and cost-effectivesampler methods compared with DC,whist Tao brush perhaps has higher accuracy by taking biopsy forthe patient thereby for early diagnosis of malignancy.
作者 申孝 王雪莱 谭艳 张雪芳 方光光 QU Xiao;WANG Xuelai;TAN Yan;ZHANG Xuefang;FANG Guangguang(Department of Gynecology,Shenzhen Second People's Hospital,Shenzhen,Guangdong 518035,China;School of Public Health,Hongkong University,Hongkong,China;Maternal and Child Health Hospital,Shenzhen,Guangdong 518120,China)
出处 《岭南现代临床外科》 2018年第3期323-326,330,共5页 Lingnan Modern Clinics in Surgery
基金 广东省深圳市科技创新委员会资助项目(JCYJ20150330102720164)
关键词 Pipelle TAO BRUSH 子宫内膜癌 筛查 pipelle Tao Brush endometrial cancer screening
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献53

  • 1杨丹,韩立敏.1969-2003年子宫内膜癌发病率及发病因素分析[J].复旦学报(医学版),2005,32(4):479-480. 被引量:33
  • 2赵健.子宫内膜细胞学诊断系统[J].中国生育健康杂志,2006,17(1):6-8. 被引量:64
  • 3欧俊,蒋铮,惠宁.子宫内膜细胞采集在子宫内膜癌早期诊断中的应用[J].中国生育健康杂志,2006,17(3):149-151. 被引量:15
  • 4Jemal A,Siegel R,Ward E,et al.Cancer statistics,2009.CA Cancer J Clin,2009,59:225-249.
  • 5Tavassoli FA,Devilee P.Tumours of the breast and female genital organs.Pathology and genetics.World Health Organization classification of tumours.Lyon:IARC Press,2003:12-13.
  • 6Sorosky JI.Endometrial cancer.Obstet Gynecol,2008,111:436-447.
  • 7Nakagawa-Okamura C,Sato S,Tsuji I,et al.Effectiveness of mass screening for endometrial cancer.Acta Cytol,2002,46:277-283.
  • 8Papaefthimiou M,Symiakaki H,Mentzelopoulou P,et al.Study on the morphology and reproducibility of the diagnosis of endometrial lesion utilizing liquid-based cytology.Cancer,2005,105:56-64.
  • 9Norimatsu Y,Kouda H,Kobayashi TK,et al.Utility of thin-layer preparation in the endometrial cytology:evaluation of benign endometrial lesions.Ann Diagn Pathol,2008,12:103-111.
  • 10Maksem JA,Meiers I,Robboy SJ.A primer of endometrial cytology with histological correlation.Diagn Cytopathol,2007,35:817-844.

共引文献118

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部