期刊文献+

贫困、疾病及精准健康扶贫政策:基于贫困居民生命质量评价 被引量:16

Poverty,disease and health poverty alleviation policy: Based on quality of life evaluation for the poor residents
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:将生命质量评价引入精准健康识别与干预政策中,通过比较不同类别贫困居民生命质量特征,揭示扶贫对象各维度现状,为完善精准健康扶贫政策提供参考。方法:评价工具采用WHOQOL-BREF量表,通过入户调查方式收集数据,采用t检验分析与中国常模数据进行比较。结果:贫困居民其人群分布表现为男性(71.7%)多于女性,年龄普遍偏大(平均55岁)。贫困居民与中国常模比较,健康组和疾病组的生命质量评价评分均显著低于中国常模的对照组,说明贫困对于居民生命质量评价的负面影响十分显著。不论处于何种收入水平,健康贫困居民总体评价均高于患病贫困居民。对于患病贫困居民而言,收入越高、其心理和总体评价越好;反之亦然。结论:健康对于贫困居民总体评价具有显著正影响、而患病对于贫困居民总体评价具有显著负影响。收入提高对于患病贫困居民的心理和总体评价改善有效。 Objective: To introduce the quality of life evaluation into the policies of accurate health identification and intervention. By comparing different poor residents' life quality characteristics,the current situation of poverty alleviation objects in all dimensions was revealed,which provided references for improving the health poverty alleviation policy. Methods: The WHOQOL-BREF scale was adopted as the evaluation tool. It collects data through household survey method,and compares it with Chinese standard data using t-test analysis. Results: The distribution of the population of poor residents with respect to gender shows that males are more than women( 71. 7% of poor male residents),and the age is generally large( average age 55) which implies that the majority of poor residents is located in the elderly people. Compared with the Chinese standard of the control group,two sample groups of poor residents' life quality evaluation scores,namely the sample group( health) and sample group( disease),were significantly lower. This indicates that the negative impact of poverty on residents' life quality evaluation is very significant.Regardless the income segment,the overall evaluation indicated that healthy and poor residents were higher than those who were sick. For the sick and impoverished residents,it was found that the higher the income the better their psychological and overall evaluation and vice versa. Conclusions: Having healthy life has a significantly positive impact on the overall evaluation of poor residents while getting sick has significantly negative influence thereof. The increase in income effectively improved for the psychological and overall evaluation of sick and impoverished residents.
作者 任田 胡锦梁 黄茂娟 潘敏 张媚 RENTian1,HUJin-liang2,HUANGMao-juan1, PAN Min3,ZHANGMei1(1. Chengdu University of TCM, Chengdu Sichuan 610075 , China;2. The People’s Hospital of Sichuan Province, Chengdu Sichuan 610072 , China;3. Sihuan Medical Love Poverty Alleviation Foundation, Chengdu Sichuan 610041 , Chin)
出处 《中国卫生政策研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2018年第5期61-64,共4页 Chinese Journal of Health Policy
基金 四川省社科规划项目(SC16B028) 四川省卫生和计划生育委员会科研课题(16PJ485)
关键词 患病贫困居民 生命质量评价 WHOQOL-BREF量表 健康扶贫政策 Sick and impoverished resident Quality of life evaluation WHOQOL-BREF alleviation policy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献30

  • 1方积乾,统计与预测,1998年,增刊,40页
  • 2柯惠新,调查研究中的统计分析法,1992年
  • 3Orley J. Quality of Life Assessment: International Perspectives [R ]. Sprin ger Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1994
  • 4World Health Organization. WHOQOL user manual[S]. Geneya: WHO,1998
  • 5世界卫生组织(WHO).全民健康覆盖研究[R].日内瓦:世界卫生年度工作报告,2013.
  • 6Neumann, J.V. and Morgenstein, O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton, N. J. : Princeton University Press, 1947.
  • 7Arrow, K.J. Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care. American Eco- nomic Review, 1963, 53( 1 ).
  • 8Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative representation of uncer- tainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992, 5(4).
  • 9Frank, R. G. Behavioral Economics and Health Eco- nomics, in Behavioral Economics and Its Application, Diamond, P. , and Vartiainen, H. (ed). Princeton, N. J. : Princeton University Press, 2007. PP195 - 230.
  • 10Akerlof, G. The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncer- tainty and the Market Mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1970, 84(3).

共引文献2398

同被引文献226

引证文献16

二级引证文献247

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部