常规无张力疝修补术与小切口疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床效果

Clinical effect of conventional tension-free hernia repair and small incision hernia repair in inguinal hernia

目的探讨常规无张力疝修补术与小切口疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床效果。方法收集我院收治的160例腹股沟疝患者,按照患者入院顺序交替分为观察组和对照组,每组80例。观察组采用小切口疝修补术治疗,对照组采用常规无张力疝修补术治疗。比较两组患者治疗效果。结果观察组患者的治疗总有效率明显高于对照组(P<0.05);观察组患者的手术时间、住院时间、术中出血量明显少于对照组(P<0.05);观察组患者并发症总发生率明显低于对照组(P<0.05),而两组的复发率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论腹股沟疝的治疗中小切口疝修补术的临床治疗效果较高,且能够缩短患者的手术时间与住院时间,降低并发症发生率,值得临床推广。

Objective To investigate the clinical effect of conventional tension-free hernia repair and small incisionhernia repair in inguinal hernia. Methods A total of 160 patients with inguinal hernia in our hospital were collected anddivided into observation group and control group according to the order of admission, with 80 cases in each group. Theobservation group was treated with small incision hernia repair, and the control group was treated with conventionaltension-free hernia repair. The treatment effects were compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate oftreatment in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group （P〈0.05）. The operative time,hospital stay and intraoperative bleeding in the observation group were significantly less than those in the control group（P〈0.05）. The total incidence of complications in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the controlgroup（P〈0.05）, but there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups（P〉0.05）. ConclusionThe small incision hernia repair in inguinal hernia has higher clinical effect, and can shorten the patients＇ operation timeand hospitalization time, with low incidence of complications. It is worthy of clinical recommendation.