期刊文献+

医疗资源平衡视角下的中美医保药品目录控费政策对比 被引量:1

Comparison of the policy of controlling fees of medicare drugs in China and the United States from the perspective of medical resource balance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从医疗资源平衡分配的视角,对中国最新版的医疗保险药品目录(2017)进行分析,并对比美国的医疗保险药品报销目录制度,分析我国国家医疗保障局成立后对医疗保险管理的影响。结果发现两国在面临相同的问题,相较于中国,美国的医保药品目录在调整方面具有市场化带来的灵活性;不足之处在于药品目录由保险公司主要负责推动制定,话语权不足。建议我国学习美国药品目录调整的灵活性,以此来更好地匹配患者需求的医疗资源;同时发挥国家统一制定的优势,在谈判使患者更多获益。 Based on the perspective of balanced distribution of medical resources,this paper analyzed the latest version of China's medical insurance " Drug Directory "( 2017), and compared the US medical insurance drug reimbursement catalog system,and analyzed the influence on medical insurance management after the establishment of China's National Medical Insurance Bureau. These results showed that two countries faced the same problems. Compared with China,the US medical insurance drug catalog displayed the flexibility brought by marketization in the adjustment, and the shortcoming was that the insurance company is mainly responsible for promoting the formulation. These findings suggest that China may learn the flexibility of the US drug catalog adjustment to better match the medical resources needed by patients.At the same time,it should take advantage of the country's unified formulation and seek more benefits for patients in the drug price negotiations.
作者 邵蓉 薛礼浚 SHAO Rong;XUE Lijun(National Drug Policy and Medical Industry Economy Research Center China Pharmaceutical University Nanjing 211198 China)
出处 《广东药科大学学报》 CAS 2018年第3期340-345,共6页 Journal of Guangdong Pharmaceutical University
基金 国家社会科学基金重大项目"我国创新药物政策环境研究"(15ZDB167)
关键词 医保药品目录 控费 医疗资源 drug reimbursement directory health costs control medical resources
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献47

  • 1郭庆文.如何获取循证医学证据[J].医学信息(西安上半月),2005,18(9):1098-1101. 被引量:6
  • 2陶立波,杨莉.药物经济学评价在药品定价中的应用研究[J].中国药房,2006,17(1):31-33. 被引量:20
  • 3[奥]曼弗雷德·诺瓦克.国际人权制度导论[M].柳华文,译.北京大学出版社,2010:61.
  • 4[美]保罗·克鲁格曼(Paul R·Krugman),[美]茅瑞斯·奥伯斯法尔德[Maurice Obstfeld] 著,海闻等.国际经济学[M]中国人民大学出版社,1998.
  • 5Andersen. R, Kravits. J and Anderson. OW. The Public's View of the Crisis in Medical Care: An Impetus for Changing Delivery Systems? [J]. Economic and Business Bulletin, 1971(24):44.
  • 6Andersen. R. Behavioral Model of Families Use of Heahh Services[R]. Chicago: Center for Health Administration Studies, U- niversity of Chicago, 1968.
  • 7Aday. LA, Andersen R, et al. Health Care in the U.S.:Equitable for Whom? [M]. Beverly Hills CA: Sage Publications, 1980:7,12-13.
  • 8Pechansky. R, Thomas. W. The Concept of Access: Definition and Relationship to Consumer Satisfaction [J]. Medical Care,1981 (2) :127-140.
  • 9David. P, Anu. G, Gerry. B. Poverty and Access to Health Care in Developing Countries [J]. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2008,11(36):161-171.
  • 10Katarina Tomasevski. Preliminary Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Education[EB/OL].199912014-10-21]. http:// daceess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G99/101/34/PDF/G9910134.pdf?. OpenElement.

共引文献89

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部