期刊文献+

我国司法实践中诉讼时效法律适用现状——对X公司诉Y公司一案中诉讼时效抗辩是否成立案例分析

Legal Application of Limitation of Action in Judicial Practice in China——A case Study of Confirmation of the Plea of Limitation of Action in the case of X Company vs. Y Company
下载PDF
导出
摘要 法的适用是实现法律的重要环节,自我国规定诉讼时效制度后,在司法实践中存在着法官并不严格适用诉讼时效制度之情形。为进一步完善法律体系,运用案例分析法研究,通过分析对X公司诉Y公司一案中法官宽松适用法律规定行为存在的问题,认为需要客观看待当下司法实践中诉讼时效适用之现状。指出当下适用宽松适用诉讼时效时应当注意的问题,以及在未来的司法实践中诉讼时效制度之法律适用将会越来越严格的主要趋势。 The application of law is an important link in the realization of law. Although the system of limitation of action is stipulated, there is still a situation in judicial practice that the judge does not strictly apply the limitation of action system. In order to further improve the legal system, the thesis uses case analysis to analyze the flaws of legal cognizance in the X Copany vs. Y Company case that the judge does not apply the limitation of action system strictly and thinks that it is necessary to look objectively at the present situation of the application of the limitation of action. What are pointed out include the problems that should be paid attention to in the application of the limitation of action, and the main trend of the application of the limitation of action system in the future.
作者 赵海盟 ZHAO Hai-meng(School of Law,Anhui University,Hefei 230601 China)
机构地区 安徽大学法学院
出处 《广西政法管理干部学院学报》 2018年第3期83-87,共5页 Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
关键词 诉讼时效 法律适用 法律依据 limitation of action legal application legal basis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献38

共引文献123

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部