期刊文献+

中澳两国财险公司效率研究——基于31家公司的数据 被引量:1

Research on the Efficiency of China and Australia Non-life Insurance Companies——Based on the Data of 31 Companies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文运用非参数法中的SBM模型和DEA窗口分析度量了中澳两国31家财险公司在2011—2015年间技术效率、纯技术效率和规模效率的变化,实证结果表明:2011—2013年中国财险公司的技术效率低于澳大利亚财险公司,2014年,中国财险公司各项效率均值呈现总体上涨势头,并在2015年反超澳大利亚。虽然我国财险公司在规模效率方面表现良好,但我国财险行业发展仍不完善,财险公司个体技术差距较大、经营管理技术不能在市场中有效流通且缺乏淘汰机制,需进一步改善。 This paper uses SBM model and DEA-window analysis to measure the changes in technical efficiency, pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency of 31 non-life insurance companies in both China and Australia between 2011 and 2015. The empirical results show that the efficiency of China's non-life insurance companies is much lower than that of Australian companies between 2011 and 2013. However,in 2014,the average efficiency of Chinese companies,especially those of small and medium-sized companies, showed an overall upward trend, and they gradually catch up and surpassed Australian companies in 2015. Although the efficiency of China's non-life insurance companies has been greatly improved,the whole insurance industry in China is still not well developed. The market mechanism cannot effectively eliminate companies with low technical efficiency,which results in an increasing gap between different individual companies,indicating technology cannot be effectively diffused in the market as well. This paper also finds that most of China's companies performed well in terms of scale efficiency. Old Chinese non-life insurance companies such as PICC Insurance,China Pacific Insurance, and Ping An Insurance companies are in the stage of diminishing return to scale due to overexpansion and they should appropriately reduce the size. However,Taiping Insurance,Huatai Insurance,Yongcheng insurance,Ansheng Tianping Insurance,and Yinda Taihe Insurance companies are in the stage of increasing return to scale in most years and they should appropriately expand the size.
作者 徐星 张彤 Xu Xing;Zhang Tong(Deakin University,Australia Melbourne 3125;The Australian National University,Australia Canberra 2610)
出处 《金融发展研究》 北大核心 2018年第6期58-67,共10页 Journal Of Financial Development Research
关键词 财产保险公司 效率 SBM模型 DEA窗口分析 non-life insurance company efficiency SBM Model DEA-Window Analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献49

  • 1杨宝臣,刘铮,高春阳.商业银行有效性评价方法[J].管理工程学报,1999,13(1):19-24. 被引量:57
  • 2姚树洁,冯根福,韩钟伟.中国保险业效率的实证分析[J].经济研究,2005,40(7):56-65. 被引量:168
  • 3魏权龄.评价相对有效性的DEA方法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1988.218-257.
  • 4CHARNES A, COOPER W W, RHODES E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978(2): 429-444.
  • 5CHARNES A, COOPER W W, LI S. Using data envelopment analysis to evaluate efficiency in the economic performance of Chinese cities [J]. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 1989(23): 325-344.
  • 6MILAN M, GORDANA S. An application of DEA for comparative analysis and ranking of regions in Serbia with regards to social-economic development [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001(132): 343-356.
  • 7盛昭瀚, 朱乔. 数据包络分析理论方法应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社,1995.
  • 8Farrell M J. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1957.
  • 9Charnes A, Cooper W W, Phodes E.. Measuring the Efficiency of DMU. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978.
  • 10Banker R D, Charnes A, Cooper W W. Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in DEA. Management Science,1984.

共引文献192

同被引文献20

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部