期刊文献+

侦查错误研究——以认知科学为视角

Research on investigation error——From the perspective of cognitive science
下载PDF
导出
摘要 侦查错误是指侦查机关或侦查人员在侦查阶段,根据侦查情势的变更,基于认知偏差而作出与案件客观情形或法律规范不符的认知或行动,因而未能达到侦查目的的一种状态。选取锚定效应及其产生的偏差、选择性信息呈现及其产生的偏差以及群体思维及其产生的偏差这三种常见的导致侦查人员出现侦查错误的认知科学因素进行分析,并针对这三种情况产生的偏差制定相应的预防机制,可以有效减少侦查错误的产生。 Investigation error refers to the fact that the investigating agency or investigator has failed to achieve the purpose of investigation in the investigation stage,for making a cognition or action that is inconsistent with the objective situation or legal norms of the case because of cognitive bias,based on the changes of investigation situation.Select three cognitive science factors of the anchorage effects and their deviations, the selected information presentation and its deviations,and group thinking and its deviations, that commonly lead investigators to investigation errors to be analyzed. To establish appropriate preventive mechanisms to the deviations arising from the various conditions can effectively reduce the occurrence of investigation errors.
作者 刘姜恩 Liu Jiangen(China Criminal Police College,Shenyang Liaoning 110854,China)
出处 《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》 2018年第3期12-17,共6页 Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice
关键词 侦查错误 认知科学 预防 investigation error cognitive science prevention
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献18

  • 1蔡定剑.法律冲突及其解决的途径[J].中国法学,1999(3):49-59. 被引量:83
  • 2龙宗智.试论证据矛盾及矛盾分析法[J].中国法学,2007(4):94-103. 被引量:45
  • 3叶鹰,武夷山.情报学基础教程[M].北京:科学出版社,2012.
  • 4Evans J S B T, Stanovich K E. Dual-process theories of higher cognition advancing the debate [ J ]. Perspectives on Psychological Science ,2013,8 ( 3 ) : 223-241.
  • 5Bin L, Ma H, Wei W, et al. The integration and comparison of the dual- processing model of anchoring effects [ C ]//Interna- tional Journal of Psychology. 27 Church Rd, Hove Brd 2fa, East Sussex, England : Psychology Press,2012, 47 : 110-110.
  • 6黎晓婷."罪"初印象:刑事审判中的锚定效应研究[C].最高人民法院.全国法院第25届学术讨论会获奖论文集,2013:12.
  • 7Tamir D I, Mitchell J P. Anchoring and adjustment during social inferences [ J ]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2013, 142(1) : 151.
  • 8斯科特·普劳斯.判断与决策[M].施俊琦,等译.北京:人民邮电出版社,2005:130.
  • 9Fumham A, Boo H C. A literature review of the anchoring effect[J].The Journal of Socio-Economics, 2011, 40( 1 ) : 35 -42.
  • 10Paritosh P K, Klenk M E. Cognitive processes in quantitative es- timation[C]//the Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Vancouver. 2006.

共引文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部