摘要
"一事不再理"原则在商标评审程序中应当如何适用、把握何种标准,实践中一直存在争议,伴随着《商标法》的修订和"一事不再理"范围的变化,老问题之上又产生了新问题。本文结合实际案例对商标评审程序中"一事不再理"的特点,"一事不再理"是实体问题还是程序问题,有关"一事不再理"的判断应适用新法还是旧法,证据上的差异是否构成"不同事实"等新老问题进行了分析。
There is controversy over the application of the non bis in idem principle, for example, in what way and standard shall it be applied to trademark review procedure. With the revision of Trademark Law and the change in the scope of non bis in idem principle, new problems arise besides old problems. The article studies the problems in relation to the non bis in idem principle, which frequently occur in trademark review cases, including the characteristics of non bis in idem in trademark review process; whether non bis in idem is an substantial or a procedural issue; whether the new or the old Trademark Law shall be applied for judging the issues concerning non bis in idem; and whether the differences in evidence constitute "different facts", etc.
出处
《知识产权》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第6期38-44,共7页
Intellectual Property