期刊文献+

不公平感知后的信任修复:道歉的作用机制 被引量:2

Trust Repair after Unfairness Perception: Effects of Apology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以往研究表明,不公平感知会导致个体的普遍信任受损。但如何修复不公平感知后的普遍信任,目前尚不清楚。本研究采用信任博弈范式,考察了道歉在不公平感知后的信任修复中的作用。结果发现:经历不公平对待后,道歉组的公平感知显著高于沉默组;道歉组的愤怒和厌恶程度显著低于沉默组;道歉组对陌生人的信任投资钱数显著高于沉默组;愤怒和厌恶分别在道歉与普遍信任之间起完全中介的作用。上述结果表明,在经历不公平的对待后,道歉能提高个体的公平感知,缓解其消极情绪,进而有效修复受损的普遍信任。 As one of the most important social norms of the human society, fairness is crucial to both individual subsistence and social stability. Social injustice will affect an individual's physical and mental health, and even the national sense of happiness. Previous studies have found that, after being treated unfairly, victims will not only distrust the offender, but affect their trust in the stranger(general trust). Trust is an essential component of the human interaction process. It can reduce social transaction costs, facilitate cooperation and promote the prosperity of society and economy. Damage to general trust is undoubtedly harmful to individuals and society. Therefore, finding an effective strategy to repair the general trust that has been damaged after unfair perception becomes a matter of urgency. This research selected 56 college students to examine the role of apology in the general trust repair after unfair distributions, in conjunction with trust game. The results showed that:(1) the fairness perception score of the apology group was significantly higher than that of the control group;(2) the degree of anger and disgust of the apology group was significantly lower than that of the control group;(3) the apology group invested significantly more money in strangers than the control group. The results show that when an individual experiences unfair treatment, apology can improve the individual's fairness perception, alleviate their negative emotions, and effectively repair damaged general trust. This study provides empirical support and reference for the restoration and reconstruction of general trust after unfair events in social life, and help rebuild social trust.
作者 陈晨 袁博 李伟强 CHEN Chen;YUAN Bo;LI Wei-qiang(Department of Psychology,Ningbo University,Ningbo 315211,China)
出处 《宁波大学学报(教育科学版)》 2018年第4期15-20,共6页 Journal of Ningbo University(Educational Science Edition)
关键词 不公平感知 道歉 信任修复 普遍信任 unfairness perception apologize trust repair general trust
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献86

  • 1刘爱玉.国企变革与下岗失业人员的行动回应[J].江苏行政学院学报,2006(4):68-74. 被引量:9
  • 2冯仕政.沉默的大多数:差序格局与环境抗争[J].中国人民大学学报,2007,21(1):122-132. 被引量:151
  • 3杜建刚,范秀成.服务补救中情绪对补救后顾客满意和行为的影响——基于情绪感染视角的研究[J].管理世界,2007,23(8):85-94. 被引量:79
  • 4Boon, S. D. & Holmes, J. G. (1991). The dynamics of interpersonal trust: Resolving uncertainty in the face of risk. In R. A. Hinde & J. Groebel(Eds.), Cooperation and prosocial behavior (pp. 190-211). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • 5Gillespie, N., & Dictz, G. 2009. Trust repair after an organization- level failure. Academy of Management Review, 34:127 - 145.
  • 6Kim, P. H. Dirks, K. T., & Cooper, C. D. (2009). The repair of trust: a dynamic bilateral perspective and multilevel concatenation. Academy of Management Review.34 (3):401 - 422.
  • 7Kim, P. H., Dirks, K. T., Cooper, C. D., & Ferrin, D. L. (2006). When more blame is better than less: The implications of internal vs. external attributions for the repair of trust after a competencevs. integrity-based trust- violation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,99:49 - 65.
  • 8Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. 1995. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20:709 - 734.
  • 9Tomlinson, E. C., & Maycr, R. C. (2009). The role of causal attribution in trust repair. Academy of Management Review. 2009, 34(1), 85 - 104. 103:193 - 210.
  • 10联合国开发计划署.《2010年人类发展报告:人口发展的途径》.http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr2010/chapters/cn/,2010年.

共引文献90

同被引文献25

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部