期刊文献+

电解质水对粪肠球菌生物膜杀菌机制的初步探索 被引量:1

The preliminary exploration of bactericidal mechanism of electrolyzed water on Enterococcus faecalis biofilm
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究强酸性电解质水(SAEW)和碱性电解质水(AEW)对粪肠球菌生物膜的作用。方法:体外培养粪肠球菌生物膜,分为SAEW处理组、AEW处理组及52.5g/L次氯酸钠(NaClO)处理组,各组分别处理0、1、2、3、4、5、10、15、30、60min后,采用菌落计数法测定各冲洗液对粪肠球菌生物膜的杀菌率;另取培养24h的粪肠球菌生物膜,分别用SAEW、AEW、52.5g/L NaClO、生理盐水处理1、5、10min后,用扫描电镜观察粪肠球菌生物膜的形态变化。结果:SAEW和52.5g/L NaClO对粪肠球菌各时间点的杀菌率显著高于AEW(P<0.05),而SAEW和52.5g/L NaClO的杀菌率无统计学差异(P>0.05);扫描电镜观察结果显示,随着处理时间的延长,SAEW、AEW及52.5g/L NaClO处理后粪肠球菌的形态变化类似,均表现为生物膜中粪肠球菌减少,细菌表面粗糙且菌体开始皱缩。结论:电解质水对粪肠球菌生物膜中的菌株具有杀灭作用,且其作用机制类似于NaClO。 AIM: To study the bactericidal efficiency and possible bactericidal mechanism of strong acid electrolyzed water (SAEW) and alkaline electrolyzed water (AEW)on Enterococcus faecalis ( E.faecalis ) biofilm. METHODS: The E.faecalis biofilm on coverslips was cultured and treated by 52.5 g/L NaClO(control), SAEW and AEW respectively.The effects were examined by the viable cell count method and the morphological change of E.faecalis was observed by scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: The bactericidal efficiency of SAEW and 52.5 g/L NaClO showed no significant difference( P 〉0.05). SAEW showed greater bacterial reduction than AEW( P 〈0.05). But after treatment, the trend of the time-dependent curves and the morphological change were similar among the 3 preparations . CONCLUSION: Both SAEW and AEW had bactericidal efficiency to E.faecalis . And the bactericidal mechanism was similar to that of NaClO.
作者 赵春苗 程小刚 余擎 ZHAO Chun-miao;CHENG Xiao-gang;YU Qing(Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics,Baoji 721006,China)
出处 《牙体牙髓牙周病学杂志》 CAS 2018年第6期327-331,共5页 Chinese Journal of Conservative Dentistry
关键词 粪肠球菌 生物膜 电解质水 杀菌机制 杀菌作用 Enterococcus faecalis biofilm electrolyzed water bactericidal mechanism bactericidal efficiency
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献26

  • 1文静,范兵.根管内粪肠球菌感染的研究进展[J].国际口腔医学杂志,2007,34(1):13-15. 被引量:13
  • 2[1]Hartke A,Giard JC,Laplace JM,et al.Appl Environ Microbiol,1998,64(11):4238-4245.
  • 3[2]Mundy LM,Sahm DF,Gilmore M.Clin Microbiol Rev,2000,13 (4):513-522.
  • 4[3]Siqueira JF Jr,Rocas IN,Scuto R,et al.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod,2001,92(4):451-457.
  • 5[4]De-Sousa EL,Ferraz CC,Gomes BP,et al.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod,2003,96(3):332-339.
  • 6[5]Engstr(o)m B.Odontol Revy,1964,15(2):87-106.
  • 7[6]Siqueira JF Jr,Rjcas IN,Souto R,et al.J Endod,2002,28 (3):168-172.
  • 8[7]Sundqvist G,Figdor D,Persson S,et al.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod,1998,85 (1):86-93.
  • 9[8]Molander A,Reit C,Dahlén G,et al.Int Endod J,1998,31 (1):1-7.
  • 10[9]Hancock HHI,Sigurdsson AD,Trope MB,et al.Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod,2001,91 (5):579-586.

共引文献14

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部