期刊文献+

认知渗透与新独断论 被引量:2

Cognitive Penetration and New Dogmatism
原文传递
导出
摘要 认知渗透指的是这样一种现象,认知状态有时会反过来影响知觉经验。认知渗透似乎对知觉辩护构成了威胁。西格尔以独断论为例,说明了认知渗透是如何给知觉辩护带来问题的。她的结论是,独断论无法应对来自认知渗透的挑战。本文表明,独断论之所以会面临认知渗透的问题,是因为它被理解为承诺了认识论的现象主义,即知觉经验可单凭它的现象特征提供辩护。但新独断论抛弃认识论的现象主义,因而不会有认知渗透的问题。相反,认知渗透恰好表明,新独断论是适切的。 Cognitive penetration is the phenomenon that cognition sometimes exerts top-down effects on perception. It seems that cognitive penetration poses a threat to perceptual justification. Taking dogmatism as a paradigm, Susanna Siegel has argued that the threat cognitive penetration posed to perceptual justification is intractable. This paper shows that the reason why dogmatism is taken to be unable to give an adequate account of cognitive penetration is that it was thought to be epistemological phenomenalism. But if we reject epistemological phenomenalism and come to endorse a new version, that is, new dogmatism, then the threat pose by cognitive penetration dissolves. The conclusion, hence, is that cognitive penetration is not a threat to new dogmatism. On the contrary, it shows that new dogmatism is adequate.
作者 王华平 WANG Huaping(Department of Philosophy,Shandong University,Jinan,Shandong,250100)
机构地区 山东大学哲学系
出处 《自然辩证法通讯》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第8期21-27,共7页 Journal of Dialectics of Nature
基金 山东大学创新团队项目(项目编号:11090077612021)
关键词 知觉辩护 认知渗透 新独断论 知觉经验 Perceptual justification Cognitive penetration New dogmatism Perceptual experience
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献28

  • 1Sextus Empiricus. Sextus Empiricus, Vol. 1, R. G. Bury (trans.), Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1976, p. 33.
  • 2Wilfrid Sellars, Richard Rorty & Robert Brandom: Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind, Cambridge: Harvard Uriversity Press, 1997, p.33.
  • 3John Locke. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, London: Adamant Media Corporation, 2006, pp. 483-484.
  • 4Jonathan Vogel. "Reliabilism Leveled", Journal of Philosophy, 2000, 97: p. 614.
  • 5Stewart Cohen. "Basic Knowledge and the Problem of Easy Knowledge", Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 2002, 65 (2): pp. 309-329.
  • 6James Pryor. "The Skeptic and the Dogmatist", Nous, 2000, 34 (4):p. 519, p. 517, p. 520, p. 532.
  • 7Tim Crane. "Intentionalism", in A. Beckermann and 13. McLaughlin (eds.), The Oxford Handbook to the Philosophy of Mind, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 474-493.
  • 8Norwood Hanson. Patterns of Discovery, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958.
  • 9H. Putnam, "Brains in a Vat", In B. Wray(ed. ), Knowledge and Inquiry: Readings in Epistemology, Broadview Press, 2002, p. 1903.
  • 10James Pryor. "There Is Immediate Justification", in E. Sosa and M. Steup (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology, Ordord: Blackwell, pp. 181-202.

同被引文献2

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部