期刊文献+

加速康复外科在中国大陆各区域医院胸外科的应用现状分析 被引量:18

Status quo of enhanced recovery after surgery in different regional thoracic surgery in the mainland of China
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析目前加速康复外科(ERAS)在中国大陆各区域医院胸外科的应用现状和面临的困难。方法对注册参加第一届胸科ERAS华西论坛的医护代表回复的773份有效问卷按照地域分区进行分析,问卷内容主要包括两部分:(1)调查对象单位及个人基本情况;(2)ERAS相关的10个问题。结果 (1)各区域(四川省、直辖市、东部、西部、南部、北部)分别有83.57%、83.82%、89.58%、93.75%、94.74%、92.86%的医护人员认为ERAS应适用于所有外科;61.84%、60.29%、65.97%、81.25%、73.68%、75.00%认为目前ERAS是理念大于实践;77.99%、80.88%、74.31%、78.13%、83.33%、69.64%认为平均住院日、患者感受和社会满意度均为ERAS的评价标准;58.50%、63.24%、54.86%、62.50%、70.18%、58.93%认为方案不成熟、无共识与规范以及医患安全无保障是ERAS应用依从性差的主要因素。(2)63.23%、67.65%、59.72%、68.75%、72.81%、67.86%认为外科为主的联合、学科整合和医护一体是ERAS方案实施的最佳团队组合;43.73%、44.12%、43.75%、46.88%、59.65%、41.07%认为多学科协作、外科为主的多模式和外科制定方案均是ERAS方案实施的最佳模式;72.98%、69.12%、62.50%、65.63%、80.70%、55.36%认为ERAS规范与共识、现状与进展、项目与实施应为会议的主要内容。结论各区域胸外科医护人员对ERAS的临床应用有较为一致的观点,学科整合、医护一体和多学科、多模式协作是ERAS方案实施的最佳团队与最佳模式。 Objective To analyze the current status and difficulties of ERAS applicated in thoracic surgery in different regional hospitals. Methods A total of 773 valid questionnaires were collected during the First West China Forum on Chest ERAS and analyzed by geographical distribution. The content of the questionnaire was divided into two parts, including the respondents' institute and personal information, as well as 10 questions about ERAS.Results There were 83.57%, 83.82%, 89.58%, 93.75%, 94.74% and 92.86% of surgeons and nurses in Sichuan province, municipalities, the eastern, western, southern and northern respectively who believed that ERAS in all surgeries should be used. There were 61.84%, 60.29%, 65.97%, 81.25%, 73.68% and 75.00% of surgeons and nurses who thought that the concept of ERAS was more in the theory than in the practice; 77.99%, 80.88%, 74.31%, 78.13%, 83.33%and 69.64% of respondents agreed that average hospital stay, patients' experience and social satisfaction should be the evaluation standard of ERAS practice while 58.50%, 63.24%, 54.86%, 62.50%, 70.18% and 58.93% of respondents believed that immature procedure, lack of consensus and specifications and insecurity for doctors were the reasons for poor compliance of ERAS; 63.23%, 67.65%, 59.72%, 68.75%, 72.81% and 67.86% of respondents thought that the best t eam of ERAS should be based on the combination of subject integration, surgery orientation and surgeon-nurse teamwork; 43.73%, 44.12%, 43.75%, 46.88%, 59.65% and 41.07% of respondents thought that multidisciplinary cooperation, multi-modality conducted and surgical programming should be the best way for ERAS implementation;72.98%, 69.12%, 62.50%, 65.63%, 80.70% and 55.36% of responders agreed that the ERAS forum or conference should include the norms and consensus, analysis and implementation of projects and the status and progress of ERAS.Conclusion There are more consistent views on the clinical application of ERAS in all regions. The subject integration,surgeon-nurse teamwork and multidisciplinary, multi-modality cooperation are the best team and best way for ERAS program implementation.
作者 郑娥 沈诚 王维 车国卫 杨梅 郭成林 刘伦旭 ZHENG E;SHEN Cheng;WANG Wei;CHE Guowei;YANG Mei;GUO Chenglin;LIU Lunxu(Department of Thoracic Surgery,West China Hospital,Sichuan University,Chengdu,610041,P.R.China)
出处 《中国胸心血管外科临床杂志》 CAS CSCD 2018年第8期681-686,共6页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
基金 四川省科技厅基金(2015SZ0158 2017SZ0168)
关键词 加速康复外科 胸外科 区域 问卷调查 Enhanced recovery after surgery thoracic surgery region survey questionnaire
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献74

  • 1江志伟,李宁,黎介寿.快速康复外科的概念及临床意义[J].中国实用外科杂志,2007,27(2):131-133. 被引量:1358
  • 2黎介寿.对Fast-track Surgery(快通道外科)内涵的认识[J].中华医学杂志,2007,87(8):515-517. 被引量:367
  • 3江志伟,黎介寿,汪志明,李宁,柳欣欣,李伟彦,朱四海,刁艳青,佴永军,黄小静.胃癌患者应用加速康复外科治疗的安全性及有效性研究[J].中华外科杂志,2007,45(19):1314-1317. 被引量:242
  • 4Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, et al. Guidelines for peri- operative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced RecoveryAfter Surgery (ERAS~ ) Society recommendations[ J]. Clin Nutr, 2012,31 (6) :783-800.
  • 5Paton F, Chambers D, Wilson P, et al. Effectiveness and imple- mentation of enhanced recovery after surgery programmes : a rapid evidence synthesis[J~. BMJ Open,2014,4(7) :e005015.
  • 6Mortensen K, Nilsson M, Slim K, et al. Consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ( ERAS ~) Society recommendations [ J ]. Br J Surg, 2014,101 (10) : 1209-1229.
  • 7Gustafsson UO, Hausel J, Thorell A, et al. Adherence to en- hanced recovery after surgery protocol and outcomes 'after colorectal cancer surgery[ J]. Arch Surg,2011,146 ( 5 ) :571-577.
  • 8P~pping DM, Elia N, Van Aken IlK, et al. hnpact of epidural analgesia on mortality and morbidity after surgery: systematic re- view and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [ J ]. Ann Surg,2014,259 (6) : 1056-1067.
  • 9Levy BF, Scott M J, Fawcett WJ, et al. 23-hour-stay laparoscopic colectomy [ J ]. Dis Colon Rectum,2009,52 (7) : 1239-1243.
  • 10Levy BF, Scott MJ, Fawcett W, et al. Randomized clinical trial of epidural, spinal or patient-controlled analgesia for patients under- going laparoscopic colorectal surgery[ JJ. Br J Surg,201 1,98 (8) : 1068-1078.

共引文献655

同被引文献186

引证文献18

二级引证文献130

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部