摘要
与普通裁判相比,司法确认裁定的既判力范围具有诸多特殊性,但立法对该问题的规定确尚未明晰。司法确认裁定的既判力在主观范围层面,应对当事人、法院和调解组织等相关主体均产生拘束力;在客观范围层面,裁定的主文和理由均应具有既判力效力;在时间范围层面,既判力基准时应为裁定作出时,既判力确定时应为裁定送达时;在效力范围层面,应包括再诉禁止效力和遮断效力,但不包括预决效力。基于以上认识,立法应对司法确认裁定既判力损害的主体设置相应的程序保障措施。
Compared with ordinary judgments,the range of Res Judicata of the Judicial Confirmation Ruling has many specialties,but the provisions of the legislation on the issue are not yet clear. In terms of subjective scope,Res Judicata of the Judicial Confirmation Ruling should be binding on related subjects such as parties,courts and mediation organizations. At the objective scope level,both the main article and the reasons for Judicial Confirmation Ruling should have Res Judicata. At the time horizon,Judicial Confirmation Ruling's The Reference of Res Judicata shall be made for the ruling,the commencement time of Res Judicata of the Judicial Confirmation ruling shall be the time when the ruling is served. At the scope of validity,Res Judicata of the Judicial Confirmation Ruling should include Bans advocating the same dispute again and prevents post-litigation,but it does not include prejudging force. Based on the above cognition,the legislation should Set up corresponding program safeguard measure to deal with the main body that the Res Judicata of Judicial Confirmation Ruling damages.
作者
胡军辉
赵毅宇
HU Jun-hui;ZHAO Yi-yu(Faculty of Law,Xiangtan University,Xiangtan,Hunan 411105,China)
出处
《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第4期36-40,共5页
Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
基金
湖南省社科基金项目"人民调解经验与机制创新实证调查研究"(201411000902003)
湖南省高校创新平台开放基金项目"人民调解司法确认制度研究"(13K048)阶段性成果
关键词
民事诉讼
司法确认
裁定
既判力
程序保障
civil litigation
judicatory affirmation
ruling
res judicata
procedural safeguards