期刊文献+

英、澳两国高等教育质量审核制度:概况、特征与启示 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 质量审核是高等教育质量保障的重要形式,英国和澳大利亚高等教育质量保障以质量审核著称。当前,普通高校本科教学工作审核评估已成为我国教育领域的重点工作,研究英国、澳大利亚高等教育质量审核制度,吸收它们在质量审核上的优秀经验,可为我国新一轮本科教学工作审核评估提供参考。审核旨在持续改善、高度独立的审核机构、重视审核人员的综合素质、学生是质量审核的重要参与者是英、澳两国高等教育质量审核制度的共性特征,这些对我国高等教育质量审核制度的建设具有借鉴作用。
作者 李晶
出处 《高教探索》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第7期82-88,共7页 Higher Education Exploration
基金 广东省扶持哲学社会科学优势重点学科建设项目"广东高校服务地方政府决策的路径研究"(GDXK201730) 广州大学青年博士专项"高等教育质量审计制度比较研究"的成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献12

  • 1Diseth, A. Students' evaluation of teaching, approaches to learning, and academic achievement [J]. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Researeh, 2007, (2).
  • 2Cano F. Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning: Their change through secondary school and their influence on academic performance [J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2005, (2).
  • 3Prosser, M., & Trigweil, K. Perceptions of the teaching environment and its relationship to approaches to teaching [J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1997, ( 1 ).
  • 4Hu, L., & Bender, P. M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternations [J]. Structural Equation Modeling, 1999, (6).
  • 5Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leu.ng, D. The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F [J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2001, (1).
  • 6Entwistle, N., Tait, H., & MaCune, V. Patterns of response to an approaches to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts [J]. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2000, ( 1 ).
  • 7Marton, F., Wen, Q., & Wong, K. 'Read a hundred times and the meaning will appear…' Changes in Chinese University students' views of the temporal structure of learning [J]. Higher Education, 2005, (3).
  • 8Marton, F., Dall' Alba, G., & Beaty. E. Conceptions of learning [J]. International Journal of Educational Research, 1993, (19).
  • 9Ramsden, P. A performance indicator of teaching quality in ihigher education: The course experience questionnaire [J]. Studies in Higher Education, 1991, i2).
  • 10Marton, F., & Saljo, R. On qualitative differences in learning I - Outcome and process [J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976, ( 1 ).

共引文献219

同被引文献18

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部