期刊文献+

人工智能的道德判断及其伦理建议 被引量:19

Moral Judgement on Artificial Intelligence and Some Ethical Suggestions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 学术界关于AI的道德判断主要存在三种不同的立场与观点。然而,对AI进行道德判断需要区分两个问题:其一是AI本身的道德评价问题;其二是AI研发与应用后果的善恶评价问题。二者既存在差别,又紧密相联。前者解决的关键在于AI道德判断的前提性规定,即AI是否真正意义上的人格实体与道德主体问题的讨论,而后者解决的关键仍在于人类自身。只有在人类与AI的关系等进行批判性反思的基础上才能对上述问题作出道德判断。具体而言,当前对AI应采取以下审慎态度:一是在大力研发和使用"弱AI"同时,应适当限制"强AI和超强AI"的研发和使用,尤其应当限制甚至禁止"杀人机器人"的研发与使用;二是国际社会、行业协会等应为不同发展阶段AI的研发与应用制定公约,确立行业发展伦理标准,并敦促相关法律法规出台,通过道德调整与法律规制引导AI健康发展;三是通过道德教育培养科技人员的道德自觉意识与社会责任意识。科技人员应当遵守科技伦理与职业道德,履行"通告和预防义务"。 There are mainly three types of understanding of the moral judgement on artificial intelligence(AI). In this paper, we argue that the moral judgement of AI should be based on the distinction of two issues, i.e. the judgement on AI itself and the evaluation of AI development and application. These are two independent issues but at the same time they are closely connected with each other: The former concerns the premise of moral judgement on AI, i.e. whether or not AI is an entity with personality and a morality subject in a real sense; the latter' s solution, however, depends totally on the human beings themselves. Moral judgments can be made only on the critical reflection on the relations between human beings and AI systematically. Specifically, prudent attitudes towards AI should be taken. First, ‘weak AI' should be developed and applied vigorously, while ‘strong AI' and ‘super strong AI' should be restricted, and in particular the development of ‘human killing robots' should be restricted and prohibited. Second, international communities and industry associations should formulate norms guiding the development and application of AI at different stages, establish ethical standards and relevant laws and regulations governing the development of AI, hence a healthy development of AI. Third, the technicians should cultivate the consciousness of morality and social responsibility, follow the scientific and technological ethics and professional ethics, and carry out the obligation of ‘notification and precaution.'
作者 王银春 WANG Yin-chun
出处 《南京师大学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第4期29-36,共8页 Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)
基金 国家社科基金项目"资本逻辑视域下的技术正义研究"(15BZX034) 东华大学现代化与文明发展研究基地研究阶段性成果
关键词 人工智能 心灵能力 理解能力 科技伦理 道德判断 artificial intelligence mental competence comprehension ability scientific and technologicalethics moral judgement
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献14

  • 1马斯洛.人的潜能和价值[M].北京:华夏出版社,1987..
  • 2邱仁宗.生命伦理学[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1987.175.
  • 3.马克思恩格斯全集(第一卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.220.
  • 4查尔斯·霍顿·库利.人类本性与社会秩序[M].北京:华夏出版社,1999..
  • 5黑格尔.法哲学原理[M].商务印书社,1982..
  • 6赫根汉.人格心理学导论[M].海口:海南人民出版社,1986..
  • 7.辞海[Z].上海:上海辞书出版社,1989..
  • 8高瑞泉.人格论[M].上海:上海文化出版社,1988..
  • 9皮亚杰 王宪钿 译.发生认识论原理"中译者序"及"英译者序"[M].北京:商务印书馆,1985..
  • 10.甚至同一学科领域中的不同学派亦会对人格拥有独特的理解与规定.如心理学中就至少有五种人格理论范型:精神分析范型、社会-文化范[M].海南人民出版社,1986.第14-15页.

共引文献60

同被引文献250

引证文献19

二级引证文献99

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部