摘要
艾伦·伍德认为马克思没有道德理论,并批判乔治·G.布伦克特的道德范围过分宽泛。布伦克特反驳了伍德观点,他构建了马克思伦理学。首先,他重释了历史唯物主义与伦理学之间的关系,认为马克思拥有一种建立在"自由"之上的美德伦理学;其次,布伦克特将马克思的自由观区别于资本主义自由观,认为前者是对后者的扬弃;再次,他强调马克思的"自由"既是手段,又是自身的目的,具有本体论意义和超越性,能够提供一种超文化标准——人和社会的自我发展程度,以此来评判一切社会的发展程度。布伦克特正确地揭示了马克思批判规则伦理学,但是他却误解了马克思的历史唯物主义,马克思持有的是与历史唯物主义相容的美德伦理学,马克思的"自由"与"幸福"内在一致。
Alan Wood thought Marx hadn＇t moral ethics and criticized the moral concept of Brenkert was too broad. Brenkert didn＇t agree with him and constructed the ethnics of Marx. Firstly he reinterpreted the relationship betweenhistorical materialism and ethics. Brenkert thought Marx had a ethics based on freedom. Secondly,Brenkert distinguished Marx＇s view of freedom from the concept of capitalist freedom. Thirdly,he emphasized Marx ＇s view of freedom both having aim and means,and having ontological significance and transcendence. It provided a super cultural standard—the degree of human and social development. Brenkert revealed exactly Marx＇sethics of criticism. However,he misunderstood Marx＇s historical materialism which is compatible with virtue ethics. Marx＇s freedom is in harmony with happiness
作者
李星
莫小丽
Li Xing;Mo Xiaoli(School of Philosophy,Beijing University,Beijing,100871)
出处
《宁夏社会科学》
CSSCI
2018年第4期5-14,共10页
NingXia Social Sciences
基金
2013年度国家社会科学基金重点项目"西方马克思学的形成和发展研究"(项目编号:13AZD027)
