期刊文献+

不同祛泡剂在胃镜检查前处置中应用效果比较 被引量:8

Comparison of the effects of different defoaming agents in the treatment before gastroscopy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:不同祛泡剂在胃镜检查前处置中应用效果比较。方法:选取就诊的150例患者,分成A组、B组、C组三组,A组患者50例服用利多卡因胶浆,B组患者50例服用二甲硅油,C组患者50例服用西甲硅油。进行对照三组患者内镜检查的黏膜清晰度、细小病灶发现率、患者不良反应、行胃镜检查时间。结果:三组患者内镜下胃腔内黏膜的清晰程度评分总和,A组7.58±1.69;B组5.87±1.27;C组5.82±1.01;C组比B组及A组评分低,清晰度高。三组之间对照比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对于微小病灶的检出情况,三组之间无明显差异,凸出的病灶且<5 mm项目比较,A、B、C三组之间的比较:χ2=6.922,P=0.031,C组、B组的内镜下凸出的病灶高于A组,且C组(30%)患者的内镜下凸出的病灶明显多于A组(10%),两组之间比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.250,P=0.012)。结论:作为胃镜检查前应用的消泡剂,西甲硅油在提高内镜下黏膜的清晰度明显优于二甲硅油及对照组利多卡因,且在一定程度有利于发现微小病灶,值得被推广应用于临床。 Objective To investigatroe and compare effects of different defoming agents in the treatment before gastroscopy.Method We conducted a randomized controlled trail recruiting 150 patients undergoing gastroscopy.Patients were assigned 1∶1∶1 to received:Group A-drink lidocaine,group B-drink simethicone,group C-drink dimethyl silicone.The mucosal visibilityscore(MVS),accuracy of small lesion diagnosis,adverse effects and total time for gastroscopy were compared among three group.Results The total score of endoscopic gastric mucosal clearance in three groups of patients was divided into three groups:group A,group B and group C,group A 7.58±1.69,group B 5.87±1.27,and group C 5.82±1.01.Compared with two methylene silicone oil group and lidocaine group,the score of the Western nail silicone oil group was lower and the clarity was higher.There was a difference between the three groups,and there was a statistical significance(P〈0.05).For the detection of small lesions,there was no significant difference between the three groups,for the convex lesions and less than 5 mm,A,B and C between the three groups:χ^2=6.922,P=0.031.The endoscopic lesions in group C and group B were higher than those in group A,and C group(30%)had more prominent lesions than those in group A(10%).There was a significant difference between two groups(χ^2=6.250,P=0.012).Conclusion As a defoamer used before gastroscopy,the increase of clarity of endoscopic mucosal is better than that of two methylene silicone and control group lidocaine,and it is helpful for finding tiny lesions to some extent,which is worthy of popularization and application in clinic.
作者 汪伟 WANG Wei(Department of digestive medicine,The People's Hospital of Sihong County,Suqian City,Jiangsu Province,Suqian 223900,Chin)
出处 《吉林医学》 CAS 2018年第8期1494-1497,共4页 Jilin Medical Journal
关键词 西甲硅油 二甲硅油 比较 Simethicone Dimethyl silicone Comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献29

  • 1Savit Kositchaiwat,Weerapat Suwanthamma,Ronnarat Suvikapakornkul,Vaewvadee Tiewthanom,Prisna Rerkpatanakit,Chaowalitr Tinkornrusmee.Comparative study of two bowel preparaton regimens for colonoscopy: Senna tablets vs sodium phosphate solution[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2006,12(34):5536-5539. 被引量:4
  • 2杨莉,葛亚彬,赵志刚.西甲硅油乳剂[J].中国新药杂志,2007,16(8):651-653. 被引量:58
  • 3劳野纯治,浜田勉,川口实.孙明军泽.内镜诊断与鉴别诊断图谱[M].沈阳:辽宁科技教育出版社,2003.20-31.
  • 4芳野纯治 滨田勉 川口实 孙明军 子轶淳 汪旭 译.内镜诊断与鉴别诊断图谱[M].沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社,2003.36-37.
  • 5丸山雅一.日本早期胃癌的诊治经验.夏玉亭,吴云林,房殿春,丸山雅一,主编.胃病诊治进展.上海:上海科技教育出版社,2005.123-124.
  • 6细川治.内镜下胃癌的筛查.夏玉亭,吴云林,房殿春,丸山雅一,主编.胃病诊治进展.上海:上海科技教育出版社,2005.101-103.
  • 7丸山雅一.日本早期胃癌的诊治经验[M]//夏玉亭,吴云林,房殿春,等.胃病诊治进展.上海:上海科技教育出版社,2005:123-124.
  • 8Kwan V, Devi~re J. Endoscopy essentials : preparation, sedation, and surveillance [ J ]. Endoscopy, 2008,40 ( 1 ) : 65 - 70.
  • 9Park JJ, Lee SK, Jang JY, et al. The effectiveness of simethicone in improving visibility during colonoscopy [J]. Hepatogastroenterology, 2009,56(94-95) : 1321-1325.
  • 10Keeratichananont S, Sobhonslidsuk A, Kitiyakara T, et al. The role of liquid simethicone in enhancing endoscopic visibility prior to esophago gastroduodeno-scopy (EGD): a prospective, randomized, Double-blinded. placebo-controlled trial [J]. J Med Assoc Thai, 2010,93 ( 8 ) : 892-897.

共引文献88

同被引文献104

引证文献8

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部