期刊文献+

乳腺癌认知问卷(Breast-CAM)的汉化及信效度检验 被引量:7

Chinesization and examination of reliability and validity of Breast Module of the Cancer Awareness Measure
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]对乳腺癌认知问卷(Breast Module of the Cancer Awareness Measure,Breast-CAM)进行汉化,并对中文版问卷的效度和信度进行初步评价。[方法]经过翻译、回译和文化调试,确定中文版Breast-CAM问卷的条目。应用中文版Breast-CAM问卷对216名住院病人的女性照顾者进行调查,通过探索性因子分析提取因子,通过计算Cronbach'sα系数和重测相关系数,检验问卷的内在一致性信度和重测信度。[结果]中文版Breast-CAM问卷的Cronbach'sα系数为0.912,问卷的折半系数为0.836,重测信度为0.721;问卷共提取疾病症状的相关知识,与乳腺改变相关的信心、技能和行为,寻求医疗帮助的障碍,乳房筛查知识和危险因素5个公因子,36个条目。[结论]修订后的中文版Breast-CAM问卷具有良好的信效度,可作为评估和测量女性人群对乳腺癌认知的测评工具。 Objective:To Chinesize the Breast Module of the Cancer Awareness Measure(Breast-CAM),and to preliminarily evaluate the validity and reliability of Chinese version of Breast-CAM.Methods:The Chinese version of Breast-CAM was determined after translation and cross-cultural adaptation.Totally 216 female caregivers of inpatients were investigated with the Chinese version of Breast-CAM.The factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis,the consistency reliability and retest reliability were test by using Cronbach'sαcoefficient and retest correlation coefficients.Results:The Cronbach'sαcoefficient of the Chinese version of the BreastCAM was 0.912,the half coefficient was 0.836,and the retest reliability was 0.721.The Chinese version Breast-CAM included 5 common factors,36 items.The 5 common factors were disease symptoms related knowledge,confidence,skills and behavior associated with breast change,barriers of seeking medical help,breast screening knowledge and the risk factors.Conclusions:The revised Chinese version of Breast-CAM had good reliability and validity,which could be used to evaluate and measure the cognition of breast cancer among women.
作者 谭艳 谌永毅 李旭英 李金花 蔡欣 袁忠 魏涛 Tan Yan;Chen Yongyi;Li Xuying(Hunan Cancer hospital/The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medcine,Central South University,Hunan 410013 China)
出处 《护理研究》 北大核心 2018年第14期2216-2221,共6页 Chinese Nursing Research
关键词 乳腺癌 乳腺癌认知问卷 汉化 信度 效度 测评工具 翻译 专家咨询 breast cancer Breast Module of the Cancer Awareness Measure,Breast-CAM Chincsization reliability validity assessment tool translation expert consultation
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献83

  • 1杨晓莉,吕海燕,李曙光.医生和护士对医护合作所持态度的对比研究[J].中华护理杂志,2006,41(5):466-469. 被引量:125
  • 2Polit, DF, Beck, CT. the content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? critique and recommendations[J]. Research in Nursing& Health, 2006,29,489-497.
  • 3Lynn . MR Determination and quantification of content validify [J]. Nursing Research, 1986,35(6) :382-385.
  • 4Davis, LL. 1992. Instrument review: getting the most from a panel of experts[J]. Applied Nursing Research, 1992, 5(4): 194-197.
  • 5Polit, DF, Beck, CT, Owen, SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations [J]. Research in Nursing &Health, 2007,30,459-467.
  • 6Grant, JS, Davis, LL. Selection and use of content experts for instrument development[J]. Research in Nursing & Health, 1997, 20, 269-274.
  • 7Waltz, CF. Strickland, O. , & Lenz, E. Measurement in nursing and health research[M]. 3rd ed. 2005. New York: Springer Publishing Co. 20-69.
  • 8尹祚芊 林小玲 冯容庄 等.个案管理师与医师临床实务合作之分析.荣总护理,2002,19(2):113-124.
  • 9薛薇.SPSS统计分析方法及应用[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2010:234-293.
  • 10Wynd CA,Schmidt B,Schaefer MA.Two quantitative approachesfor estimating content validity[J].Western J Nurs Res,2003,25(5):508–518.

共引文献1821

同被引文献86

引证文献7

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部