期刊文献+

刑事非法证据排除规则若干问题研究

Research on the Exclusionary Rule of Illegal Evidence in Criminal Proceedings
下载PDF
导出
摘要 非法证据排除规则在我国刑事诉讼法中占据着重要的地位,它的实施有力地推进了我国法制建设的进步。但是该规则在实际运行中也存在许多亟待解决的问题,如:非法证据排除程序中证明责任不清、当事人辩护权得不到有效行使、"毒树之果"是否应当予以排除等等。文章介绍了几个代表性国家和地区的相关制度规定,分析他们对此类问题的解决方式,通过学习和借鉴国外的有关经验,再结合我国的司法实践和基本国情,针对我国刑事诉讼法非法证据排除规则中出现的若干问题进行研究探讨,提出相应的建议和解决方案,促使我国非法证据排除规则的运行更加顺畅。 The enforcement of the rule of exclusion of illegal evidence has promoted the legal construction of our country,which occupies an important position in the criminal procedure law.However, there are many problems to be solved in the actual operation of this rule,such as the unclear burden of proof in the illegal evidence exclusion procedure,the lack of effective exercise of the parties' right to defense, whether the fruit of the poison tree should be excluded, and so on. This paper discusses some problems in the exclusion rule of illegal evidence in criminal procedure law, introduces several representative countries in foreign countries, analyzes their solutions to the related problems, and learns and draws lessons from the relevant experiences of foreign countries. Combined with the judicial practice of our country The author puts forward the corresponding solutions and suggestions in order to make the rule of illegal evidence exclusion run more smoothly in the future.
作者 马春娟 武素芳 MA Chun-juan;WU Su-fang(Law School of Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou,Henan 45000)
机构地区 郑州大学法学院
出处 《怀化学院学报》 2018年第4期73-77,共5页 Journal of Huaihua University
关键词 非法证据 毒树之果 证明责任 illegal evidence fruit of poison tree burden of proof
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献69

  • 1熊秋红.英国刑事诉讼中对非法获得的证据处理之评析[J].国家检察官学院学报,1997,5(2):53-58. 被引量:22
  • 2余捷.规则与裁量——英国非法证据处理方法之特色评析[J].西南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版),2006,27(6):176-181. 被引量:4
  • 3克劳斯.罗克辛,王世洲.德国刑事诉讼法对被告人的保护[J].中外法学,2007,19(1):87-98. 被引量:11
  • 4龙宗智.取证主体合法性若干问题[J].法学研究,2007,29(3):133-143. 被引量:90
  • 5赵彦清.受基本人权影响下证据禁止理论--德国刑事诉讼法中的发展[G]//欧洲法通讯(第五期),北京:法律出版社,2003:276,277.
  • 6Kuk Cho , "procedural weakness" of German criminal justice and its unique exclusionary rules based on the right of personality [J] , 15 Temple International and Comparative Law Journal , Spring 2001 . p . 1 - 30 .
  • 7林钰雄.论不自证己罪原则--欧洲法整合趋势及我国法发展之评析.台大法学论丛,2005,(2):31-45.
  • 8Craig M. Bradley . The Exclusionary Rule in Germany [J] , 96 Harvard Law Review , 1983 , p . 1050 .
  • 9Mireille Delmas- Marty & J. R. Spencer. European Criminal Procedures [ M ]. Cambridge University Press , 2002. p. 607.
  • 10许汉天.德国普通刑事程序的新发展--从法定原则走向便宜原则.月旦法学杂志,2007,(2):244-245.

共引文献139

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部