期刊文献+

高等教育质量管理的异化风险——基于国际经验的比较与启示 被引量:2

Risk of Dissimilation in Quality Management of Higher Education :Based on the Comparision of International Experience and Its Solution
下载PDF
导出
摘要 不恰当的高等教育质量管理活动可能会削弱高校办学自主权,抑制创新和多样性,增加高校及其教师教育和研究工作之外的负担,而使高等教育质量管理活动异化为保障和提高高等教育质量的障碍。质量评估、制定质量标准等质量保障措施都存在异化风险。高等教育质量管理宜着眼于督促高校承担质量责任、激发高校活力和创造性,而不宜过分着眼于规范高校教育活动。 Inappropriate quality management of higher education may weaken the autonomy of universities and colleges in running education, impede their innovation and diversity and increase the burden beyond education and research for colleges and their faculty members, which may dissimilate the quality management of higher education to be in the way of the assurance and improvement of the quality of higher education. The risk of dissimilation exists in quality assurance measures, such as quality evaluation and the making of quality standard. Therefore, the management of higher education quality should aim at urging colleges and universities to undertake the responsibility of improving quality and stimulating their vitality and creativity instead of excessively focusing on regulating education activities in colleges and universities.
作者 马凤岐 MA Feng-qi(School of Education,Guangzhou University,Guangdong Guangzhou 510006,China)
出处 《苏州大学学报(教育科学版)》 2018年第2期33-40,共8页 Journal of Soochow University(Educational Science Edition)
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"保障和落实高等学校办学自主权研究:资源依赖理论视角"(项目编号:16YJA880027) 广东省教育厅创新团队项目"广东省高等教育质量保障政策研究"(项目编号:2018WCXTD016)的阶段性研究成果
关键词 质量管理 质量评估 质量标准 quality management quality evaluation quality standard
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献99

  • 1金顶兵.英国高等教育评估与质量保障机制:经验与启示[J].教育研究,2005,26(1):76-81. 被引量:89
  • 2黄兴帅.地方院校推行双语教学的问题与对策[J].高等农业教育,2006(1):60-62. 被引量:20
  • 3CHEA, “recognized Accrediting Organizations” ( as of April 2008). www. chea. org
  • 4Judith Eaton, “The future of accreditation?” .第3页.www.chea. orgo
  • 5Judith Eaton, “Federal policy events and reflections on the ac- creditation- government relationship: Four Points”; Judith Eaton, “Consequences of the commission on the future of higher education: Where do we stand”; Judith Eaton, “The future of accreditation?”www. chea. org. Judith Eaton
  • 6ENQA(2003), “Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area. http//: www. enqa. eu
  • 7ENQA, “Quality Procedures in the European Higher Education Area and Beyond Second ENQA Survey”. http//: www. enqa. eu
  • 8Brennan, John, Shah, Tarla, (2000), “Quality assessment and institutional chage: Experience from 14 countries”. Higher Education.
  • 9Trine Dano, Bjom Stensaker, (2007, Spring), “Still balancing improvement and accountability? Developments in External quality assurmlce in the Nordic Countries 1996 - 2006”. Quality in Higher Education, Vol. 13, pp.81-93.
  • 10Martin A. Trow, (2.005), “Reflections on the Transition from Elite to Mass to Universal Access: Forms and Phases of Higher Education in Modem Societies since WWII”, unpublished paper. University of California, Berkeley. http://repositofies.cdlib.org/igs/WP2005-4

共引文献97

同被引文献17

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部